SEO Forum
 
SEO Problems SEO Knowledge Database Seo Forum Search engine optimization
  FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Seo FORUM » Google Search Engine Forum View previous topic :: View next topic  
Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?
 PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:48 am Reply with quote  
Message
  Jailor

Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 3

Search Engine Journal recently wrote an article quoting pieces of a debate that's sprung up about digg (and more generically, the social bookmarking sites) being included in google's index.

Here are the arguments:

Allen Stern:

Quote:
My belief is that this is not enough to warrant a listing in Google. Since at its most basic sense Digg only offers a link to the actual story, then that story should occupy that position within Google, not the Digg link. I believe content publishers actually lose the chance to see that visitor because the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that. And I am talking about mainstream non-diggers now, not the group who already understands what Digg is for.

William Burn:

Quote:
Digg.com is acting as a gateway to the great content which would (usually) have been lost in Google’s monolithic index, never to be found or stumbled upon by searchers. Additionally, as a counter to his “the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that” statement, the Digg.com interface is very easy to use, it’s almost an exact clone of a Google result (a big blue link/title with description underneath) so the user will already be familiar with it, as a result the user would not be confused by it and will find their way to the content they were looking for; that’s if the content still appeals to them after reading the accompanying description.

Personally, I am a bit conflicted on this issue. Digg obviously has the ability to provide extra search engine exposure for content. If said content is on a site that doesn't rank well in the SE's then the Digg listing can help guide traffic to the content.

However, as Allen said, Digg is just listing a sentence or two of the content. That's not nearly enough and really that listing shouldn't come before the actual content that Digg is pointing to. So, IMO google and the other SE's should figure out a way to rank the original content before Digg's listing, perhaps with the Digg listing (and the subsequent discussion on the topic) as a sub-listing. This could be done for any and all of the major social bookmarking sites that link to that specific story.

What do you think?
______________________________
Sports Betting
Dell coupons
 PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:10 pm Reply with quote  
Message
  dueces

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 1

I believe Digg is a great way to get your content crawled faster. Other than that to me it has little or no seo value
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Searchenginegenie.com Forum Index » Google Search Engine Forum

Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Display posts from previous:

  

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Search Engine Optimization SEO Company