|
|
|
 [/img]
The whole world watched Andrew Symonds utter a few words at Ishant Sharma as he walked away after being bowled by the youngster, and Ishant retaliating by pointing towards the pavilion.
While Ishant was certainly in breach of clause 1.6 of the ICC Code of conduct, Symonds provocative action that started it all seems to have gone unpunished yet again. Rohit Sharma was also fined 10 per cent of his match fee for just standing his ground and walking off shaking his head during Gabba ODI against Sri Lanka on February 4.
Do you think the match referees pick on Indians and are generally soft on Aussies? Why is it that it’s an Indian player who is always at the receiving end of match referees’ actions? Could it be possible that the strong arm tactics deployed by the BCCI against ICC and other officials, as exemplified by the Harbhajan episode, mean that several officials are raring to have a go at the Indians?
'Provoking' behaviour ..."Our plea was Symonds provocated [sic] Ishant and that's why he did what he did.....
Its survey that .... Umpires are much favor to Aussies...... Its Too Bad.... |
|
