Who is the nicest guy in the world

Worst person in the world

John Fitzgerald Page Is The Worst Person In The World

Sexiest Men in the world
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=sexiest+guy+in+the+world

Smartest Man in the world
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=smartest+man+in+the+world

Most intelligent Man in the world currently living

A good discussion on that here,

Toughest Man in the world:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=toughest+man+in+the+world
Mr T:

Greatest Man in the world
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=greatest+man+in+the+world

World's Sweetest Man
Gary David Goldberg

Most caring Man in the world:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Most+caring+man+in+the+world
Saddam Hussian

Most Dangerous Man in the world:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Most+dangerous+man+in+the+world
A.Q Khan

Most wanted man in the world

Osama bin Laden

Most talked man in the world
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Most+talked+man+in+the+world
http://www.imeem.com/angelo/playlist/EobpP8Le/edison_chen_worlds_most_talked_about_man_video_playlist/

Most adventurous man in the world
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Most+adventurous+man+in+the+world
http://www.zestforadventure.com/zest_adventure_man.html

Most Clever Man in the world:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=Most+clever+man+in+the+world
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060717052610AA5R5aY

Labels: Google

Labels: Search Engine Optimization, search engines, SEO Tools

Labels: pagerank, pagerank update

Labels: Google update, pagerank, pagerank update

Labels: Google, Search Engine Marketing, Spam

Labels: Search Engine Marketing, Search Engine Optimization, Spam

Labels: pagerank

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Labels: Google, penalty, Search Engine Optimization

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts

Labels: Google, Spam

Financial results Summary as per Google's investor relations:

Q1 Financial Summary
Google's results for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, include the operations of DoubleClick Inc. from the date of acquisition,
March 11, 2008, through the end of the quarter, and are compared to
pre-acquisition results of prior periods. The overall impact of DoubleClick in
the first quarter of 2008 was immaterial to revenue and only slightly dilutive
to both GAAP and non-GAAP operating income, net income and earnings per
share. Google reported revenues of $5.19 billion for the quarter ended March 31,
2008, an increase of 42% compared to the first quarter of 2007 and an increase
of 7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2007. Google reports its revenues,
consistent with GAAP, on a gross basis without deducting traffic acquisition
costs, or TAC. In the first quarter of 2008, TAC totaled $1.49 billion, or
29% of advertising revenues. Google reports operating income, net income, and
earnings per share (EPS) on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. The non-GAAP
measures, as well as free cash flow, an alternative non-GAAP measure of
liquidity, are described below and are reconciled to the corresponding GAAP
measures in the accompanying financial tables.
GAAP operating income
for the first quarter of 2008 was $1.55 billion, or 30% of revenues. This
compares to GAAP operating income of $1.44 billion, or 30% of revenues, in the
fourth quarter of 2007. Non-GAAP operating income in the first quarter of
2008 was $1.83 billion, or 35% of revenues. This compares to non-GAAP operating
income of $1.69 billion, or 35% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2007.

GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2008 was $1.31 billion
as compared to $1.21 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007. Non-GAAP net
income in the first quarter of 2008 was $1.54 billion, compared to $1.41 billion
in the fourth quarter of 2007.



GAAP EPS for the first quarter of 2008 was
$4.12 on 317 million diluted shares outstanding, compared to $3.79 for the
fourth quarter of 2007 on 318 million diluted shares outstanding. Non-GAAP
EPS in the first quarter of 2008 was $4.84, compared to $4.43 in the fourth
quarter of 2007.
Non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin,
non-GAAP net income, and non-GAAP EPS are computed net of stock-based
compensation (SBC). In the first quarter of 2008, the charge related to
SBC was $281 million as compared to $245 million in the fourth quarter of
2007. Tax benefits related to SBC have also been excluded from these
non-GAAP measures. The tax benefit related to SBC was $51 million in the
first quarter of 2008 and $42 million in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to GAAP operating income, operating margin,
net income, and EPS are included at the end of this release.
GOOG Financial results.

Labels: Goog, Google

SEO Blog Team,
Blogger Labels code download Free

Labels: blogger

I just read this very interesting interview from Vice president of Search Quality in Google Mr.Udi Manber,

According to wikipedia

"Udi Manber (Hebrew: אודי מנבר‎) is an Israeli computer scientist. He is one of the authors of agrep and GLIMPSE. As of December 2007, he is employed by Google as one of their vice-presidents of engineering.
[edit] BiographyHe earned both his bachelor's degree in 1975 in mathematics and his master's degree in 1978 from the Technion in Israel. At the University of Washington, he earned another master's degree in 1981 and his Ph.D. in computer science in 1982.
He has won a Presidential Young Investigator Award in 1985, 3 best-paper awards, and the Usenix annual Software Tools User Group Award software award in 1999.
He was a professor at the University of Arizona and authored several articles while there. He wrote Introduction to Algorithms -- A Creative Approach (ISBN 0-201-12037-2), a book on algorithms.
He became the chief scientist at Yahoo! in 1998.



In 2002, he joined Amazon.com, where he became "chief algorithms officer" and a vice president. He later was appointed CEO of the Amazon spin-off company A9.com. He filed a patent on behalf of Amazon.[1]
As of February 8, 2006, he has been hired by Google as one of their vice-presidents of engineering. In December 2007, he announced Knol, Google's new project to create a knowledge repository.[2]
"

Labels: Google

Regarding buying links what we do is we try to tackle things algorithmically but we also try things that are scalable and robust. So when I refer both algorithm and user both actually has to go well. So its more on the line to give people the heads up yeah we do consider buying links outside our guidelines and I just sort of notify that we may take strong action against sites in future. So people want to do that they always have the rights if you are the webmaster its your site you can do what ever you want to do on your site I totally support that idea but we Search Engine think and decide what we feel is best to return a high quality index. So people want to co-operate with Google and users and try to do things in a way that is good for users , good for them and good for the search engines that's fantastic. And we will try to return the best results we can.

Labels: Mattcutts Video Transcript, search engines

Hello Matt: I was talking about the Trust Rank and you said something is going on with the Trademark or I don't know I couldn't concentrate but so can you tell something more about it.



Mattcutts: Yes let me know talk about that a little bit. What is trust rank everybody is curious about that. Its kind of nice to ask , everybody has a vague view about it. So turns out there was someone in Yahoo , Peterson and some other people at yahoo and they wrote a paper about something called Trust Rank and what it does is it tries to treat reputation and like physical mass how it goes around the web and what physical properties does trust have and its really interesting stuff but its completely separate from Google.



And so couple of years ago at the exact same time Google was working on a Anti-phishing filter and part of that we need to come up with a name for it so they filed for a trademark and I think they used the name Trust rank and it was really a coincidence yahoo had a Trust Rank as a search research project and we had Trust rank as a trademark so everybody talks about Trust Rank, Trust Rank and so if you ask five different people they will have five different opinions about exactly what trust rank is.

Labels: Mattcutts, Search Engine Optimization

I am up in the Kirkland office today, Up here for an outside little bit planning and they said you see why don't we throw together video and like 10 minutes or less. So we said alright lets give it a shot. So we are thinking about some of the common things you do with webmaster console or some topics webmasters want to hear about people want to go to webmaster console and check their backlinks.



They also like to know if they have any penalties there are a lot of really good stats in the webmaster console. One thing I had been hearing questions about is how do I remove my URLs from Google. So why would you want to do this well suppose you are in school and you accidentally left your Social Security Number of all your students up on the web or your store you left people's credit card numbers. Or you are running a forum and suddenly you are spammed full of porn by a Ukrainian forum spammer which happened to a friend of mine recently. So whatever the reason you want some URLs out of Google instead of getting URLs into Google. Lets look at some of the possible approaches some the different ways you can do it.

What ill do is , ill go through each of these ones and will kind of draw a Happy Face by one or two I think are specially good as far as getting the contents out of Google or perhaps abandoning them from getting into Google the first place. So the first thing a lot of people say is ok I just don't like to a page is a secret server page Google won't know or ever find it that way I don't have to find a way up of showing up the Search Engines. This is not a great up roach and ill give you a very simple reason why. We actually see so many people surf to a page and then serve to an other web server and that causes your browser to create a referrer in the HTTP in browser codes the header status which showed up before will show up on the other web server. And that other web server shows hey these are the top referrers to my page and may be that's a clickable hyperlink then Google can crawl that other web server and find a link to your so called secret web page. So its very weak to say "you know what I don't want to link to it ill just keep it a secret and no one will ever find about it". For what ever reason somebody will call from that page somebody will link from that page, somebody will refer from that page or as I said somebody will accidentally link to that page and that's you know if there is a link on web to that page there is a reasonable reason that we might find it so I don't recommend anyone using that its relatively very weak way. An other way you can do is something called .htaccess. Ok that sounds little, let me tell you very simply. This is a very simple file that lets you do simple things like redirect from one URL to an other URL the thing I am specifically talking about is can password protect a sub-directory or even you can protect your entire site now I don't think we provide a .htaccess tool in the webmaster tools but that's ok there are a lot of them out on the web and if you do a simple search like .htaccess tool or wizard something like that you will find one that will say like a password protective directory and it can even tell a directory and generate one for you and you can just copy and paste that onto your website.



So this is very good why is this strong why am I going to draw a Happy face here. Well you got a password on that directory Googlebot is not gonna guess that password you know we are not going to crawl that directory at all and we if we cant get to it . It will never show up in our index. This is very strong, very robust and efficient for the search engine because someone has to know the password to get into that directory. So this is one of the two ways I really really recommend this is a preventive measure so if already got chance to get into it you already had it vulnerable on your site so if you plan in advance and you know what the sensitive areas are going to be just put a password on there and it will work really well.

Ok here is an other way one that a lot of people know about called Robots.txt. This one has been here for over a decade atleast 1996 and essentially its like a electronic no trespassing sign it says here are areas of your site that Google or other search engine are not allowed to crawl, we do provide robots.txt tool in the webmaster console so you can create one and test out URLs and see if Googlebot is allowed to get to them , you can test out like the different variants of Googlebot like the Image-Googlebot is allowed to get to it and you can take new robots.txt files for test drive so you can say how about I try this for my robots.txt could you crawl this URL, or could you crawl this URL and you can just try it out and make sure it works ok. That's nice because other wise you are going to shoot yourself on your foot say you make a robots.txt and make it like and it has a syntax error and say it keeps everybody in or keeps everybody out that's going to cause a problem. So I recommend you take that tool for a test drive and see what you like and then you can put it live.

Then ok robots.txt is kind of interesting, different search engines have different polices of uncrawled URLs , ill give you a very simple example way, way, way back in days sites like Ebay.com , Nytimes.com don't want anyone to crawl their site so they had a robots.txt file that said

Useragent: *
Disallow: / ( everybody )

So this will not allow any search engines to crawl even if you are a well behaved search engine. So that is kind of problematic so you are a search engines and somebody typed in Ebay and you cannot return Ebay.com it looks kind of dumb and its like what we decided or what we our policy still is we will crawl this page but we will not show a uncrawled reference sometimes we can make it look pretty good about it. Sometimes if there is a entry to nytimes.com in the Open Directory project ( ODP ) we can show that snippet from the ODP and show it for nytimes.com as a uncrawled reference and for users its good even though we are not allowed to crawl and we infact did not crawl it. So robots.txt is to prevent crawling but it wont completely prevent that URL from completely showing up in Google so there are otherways to do it. Lets move on to NOINDEX meta tag. What that simple says for Google atleast is don't show that page at all in search engines so if we find Noindex we will completely drop it from Google search results we will still crawl it but we wont actually show it if somebody does a search in search result query for that page. So its pretty powerful works very well and very simple to understand there are couple complicating factors, yahoo and Microsoft even if you use the noindex meta tag can show a reference to that page, they wont return the complete the full snippet and stuff like that but you might see the link to that. We do see some people having problem with that for example you are a webmaster and you put up a noindex meta tag and put it up on your site been shifting around in developing your site you might forget and might not take that noindex meta tag down so very simple example. The Hungarian version of BMW I think has done this, there is a musician ( harper ) you probably heard about is pretty popular has a noindex metatag its still there and if you are the webmaster of that site we love you to take that down. So there are various people in google would have said may be we should not show the snippet of the url but show a reference to that URL. There is one other corner case on this noindex which is we can only abide by that meta tag only if we had crawled that page of we haven't crawled that page we haven't seen that meta tag and we haven't know its there. So in theory its possible if you link to that page and we don't get a chance to crawl that page we don't see a noindex and we don't drop It out completely. So there are couple of cases where you have atleast the reference which will show up in google and pretty much yahoo and Microsoft will always have a reference to that page if you use the noindex metatag.

So here is another approach you can use that is the Nofollow tag that can be added on individual links. This is an other type weak approve since inevitably say there are 20 links to that page may be I am going to put a Nofollow on all of them may be it's a sign in page may be if you are a expedia.com and you want to add a Nofollow on my itineraries it makes perfect sense right. Why would you want Googlebot to crawl into your itineraries because that's a personalized thing. But inevitably somebody links to that page or you forget to have a page which not every single link with a Nofollow so its very common that, ill just draw a very simple example suppose we have a page A and we have a Nofollow link to page B,

We will follow that link we will drop it out of our link graph we will drop it off completely so we wont discover page B because of this link but now like say there is an other guy on page C that wants to link to page B we might actually follow that link and will eventually end up indexing page B so you can try to make sure every link to a page is no-followed but sometimes its hard to follow that every single link is no-followed correctly so this like the NOINDEX does have some weird corner cases where you can very easily a page gets crawled since not every link has the Nofollow-ed or in the noindex case we can actually get to the page and end up crawling the page and end up later seeing the noindex tag. So lets move on to an other powerful way I tend to use this whenever a forum gets by porn spammer recently. And that's the URL removal tool. So .htaccess is great as a preventive measure you put a password on it no-one can guess what it is, no search engine's are going to get in there, it wont get indexed. The other thing you can do is if you do let the search engines in before and you want to take it down later you got the URL removal tool. We have offered the URL removal tool for atleast 5 years probably more for long time it sat on pages like services.google.com and it's a completely self service that runs 24/7 but just recently the webmaster console team has integrated the URL removal tool into the webmaster console. Much much simpler to use the UI is much better what it helps is it will remove the URL for 6 months and if that was a mistake and if you removed your entire domain which you don't need to then you need to email Google's user support telling them hey I didn't mean to remove my entire site can you revoke that and someone in google have to do that. Now you can do it yourself also its powerful and well accessible in webmaster console. Anytime you can go in to webmaster console and say hey I didn't mean to remove my entire site and remove that request and that request gets revoked very quickly. So to use the webmaster console its not that hard to prove that you are the owner of the site, you just need to make a page on the root of the website , root of the directory or root of the site to say yep here is a little signature in the text file to say that this is my site. Once you prove that this is my domain then you get a lot more stats and this wonderful little URL remove tool. And it can remove a very nice level of speed in there you can remove a whole domain, you can remove a sub-directory thing you can even remove individual URLs and you can see actually the status of all the URLs you have put a request to be removed, initially it will show a status that the request is pending and later it will show that the URL removal has been processed/ removed. This will change the status to revoke. You can give a reason what ever you have like hey I got the credit card numbers, Social security numbers of what ever sensitive you had there removed and you want to revoke the URL removal from Google's index. In other words its save to crawl and index again. So all the ways to remove the URLs or churning up URLs from showing up in Google there are a lot of different options some of them are very strong like the robots.txt, noindex but they do have these very weird corner cases like we might show the reference to the URL in varied situations so that ones that I definitely recommend is the .htaccess that will prevent the search engines and people from getting into the first place and for Google we have the URL removal tool so if you got URLs crawled that you don't want to show up in Google's index you can still get them out and get them out relatively quickly.

Thanks Very much Hope that was very helpful.

Matt Cutts.

Why we prepared this Video transcript?

We know this video is more than a year old but still there are people who have questions about their site and want to listen from a Search Engine Expert. Also there are millions of Non-English people who want to know what's there in this video so a transcript is something that can be easily translated to be read in other languages. We know there are people with hearing disability who browse our site this is a friendly version for them where they can read and understand what's there in this video.

This transcript is copyright - Search Engine Genie.

Feel free to translate them but make sure proper credit is given to Search Engine Genie

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

By the Way I shoot my disclaimer to somebody in Google video's team and he said matt you look like you had been kidnapped so maybe I should be some rocket boom world map or something like that out there you guys worry more about the information that how pretty it looks I am guessing, alright todder writes in my simply question is this "which do you find more important in developing and maintaining a website search engine optimization or end user optimization?"



And that says ill hang up and listen, todder that's a great question well both are very important and I think if you don't have both you wont do the best you want to do, I think search engine optimization its harder to be found if you don't have end user optimization you don't get conversion you don't get people to really stay and really enjoy your site post in your forum or buy your product or anything else. SO I think you do need both the trick in my mind is to try to see the world such that they are the same thing. You want to make it look best so that the user's interest and the search engine interest are as aligned as you can and if you can do that then you are usually in very good shape because you have compeling content you have people want to visit your site. It will be very easy for your visitors to get around and for search engines to get around. And you don't have to do any weird tricks anything you do for search engines are also be shown to users. So I think you need to balance both of them.

Tedsey writes in with a couple of interesting questions "can you point us to some spam detection tools, I want to monitor my site to make sure I come out clean and show that I am valid among the no good spamming competitors. Well if you sure want to check spamming some tools you can use.



First of in Google we have lot of tools to detect and flag spam but most of them are not out side of Google one thing you can look at is Yahoo site explorer which is good it actually shows backlinks for specific pages or per domain I think that could be very handy. There are also other tools that could show you everything in one IP address, if you are going to be on a virtual host you are going to share with a lot of perfectly normal sites but sometimes there might be a lot of bad spam sites on that Ip address and you could end up in the wrong way. So you got to be careful that you are not automatically considered part of something wrong. As far as checking your specific site is concerned I will definitely hit Google sitemaps in webmaster console that will tell you crawl errors or other problems we found.

Second question tedsey asks "What about the cleanliness of code for example W3C, any chance that the accessible problem will leak into the main algorithm?" People had been asking me this for a long time and my typical answer is normal people write code with errors it just happens all the time. Eric one of the founders of the HTML standards said 40% of all html pages have syntax errors and there is no way a search engine can remove 40% of its contents from its index just because somebody didn't validate or something like that. So there are a lot of content especially content that is manmade students that already use or things like that its very quality but probably doesn't validate. So if you asked me a while a go I would have said yah I don't have a signal like that in our algorithms and its probably for a good reason that said now T.V Raman had done the work on accessible search and you know I am sure in future somebody can look at for a possible positive signal. If you have pass through the quality you have to pass through vigorous validation and stuff like that in general its great idea to go and get your site validated. But I wouldn't put that in top of your list, I would put on making compelling content and making a great site at the top of your list and once you have got that you can go back and dug your eyes and check whether you got good accessibility as well. Well you always want to have good accessibility but validating and closing off that last few things usually that doesn't matter a lot for search engines.

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Ya,Ya. It was just a bunch of Q&A it was fun

Yep, Ya, Ya, Well that's something they have been doing a little more is submit sessions so there is penalty box submit tomorrow so its gonna be nice, That what people wants its like a 2 way thing a lot more than, ok, lets plan your thing with a power point then some time for questions, There is a little bit of power point, but lot of it is like what u wan the most, what r the features u really need'

Ya it was funny at the end, That when I laughed, Ok u have seen most of it, so she gave puffy examples instead, good willow bad willow, good centre good centre,

It worked ya it worked Hmm,Hmmm, Yep ,Ya

I think its interesting, it's a deep issue, Its kinda tough 1 too, so really good question of claiming your content but then, we were talking about that couple of days ago with a bunch of goggle's, And we always have to worry about how it can be found, and so, what if somebody innocent doesn't claim their content, and then, and then smart man that comes along, and claims everybody else's content,

And so when u have got your whole frequency and u have to worry about people taking your content in between the time u scroll your pages that's a tricky thing, Now nice thing is some thing like blog search, we get a pinning, we get to scroll it, we can see it rite then, so the time frame in blog search is so much faster, so we get to little bit more on ownership, so I think we hoping to try in a lot of different things but it is a difficult issue.

Yep, Right, Yep

Ya u know, 1 thing v have said is which is pretty good rule have come is if u do syndicate your content, try n make sure people know you are the master source of it, you can do that with the link from the article or link from the video at least that way u have got 2 copies of the same content, This one the chronicle one the real one the 3rd one is likely to have more links, so this automatically see that not only its got lot of paid links and stuff like that so this makes the job a little bit easier. So there are some good rules have come, u can do whatever u syndicate it, it helps break the tie a little bit.

Ya absolutely, some people say oh dear Google tell me what to do. And we are not, like your the web master, it's your site, u do whatever u want on your site. And that's your rite. But that's our in depths, and here we are finding what we think are best practices, and if you wanna do really well and good in Google, I think most webmasters do, here are some you can do well but you know people will always have rites to take on more risk but, we wanna tell them that there is a lot of risk involved in that, and so people should think about before they do it

Well, and I think its interesting, because we have said we don't like as early a s 2005 but we have not talked about this recently, so even though it wasn't going to be incredible popular with seos, because seos like to have as many tools in their tool boxes as possible I said it time to revise at this topics, I we can remind people about it, and so even though I knew there would be a lot of comments Its important to reintegrate use the stance and we mite be taking stronger action on it in the future so its sort of giving people the heads up, its like giving them a little bit of notice, They can choose what they wanna do but they should also think about the possible consequences of what they choose to do.

I think we would be good to make a lot of that, I talked about it during the q& A, our guide lines are pretty minimal, I wanna give the people the idea of what to do,. Triangular links, pentagonal links, Hexagonal links n stuff like that

We were saying, how about four way links, no that's against the Google line, some were like 5 way links at some point u wanna think you wanna give the idea n then and people can infer from that but I think it would be nice to have few more details, we have looked at, how can provide few more scenarios, we take some from the we set on the blog and cooperate that into the web master guide lines.

Its possible its, its more like it, we have it at the back of our mind, So for example within the past few months we have revised our webmaster help in general to say no not everything is 100% automatic, No human have ever touched that. Because u need really room for social search so it is an ongoing process we talked about search results and how its not a good process to not have tones of search results that don't add a lot of value so v do go back, for example we also added a spy-ware, Trojan, and that sort of stuff, so it is kind of living document we always go back every few months what we need to add and how are we gonna make it better.

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Google to Announce First Quarter 2008 Financial Results
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. - April 7, 2008 - Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) today announced that it will hold its quarterly conference call to discuss first quarter 2008 financial results on Thursday, April 17, 2008 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time (4:30 p.m. Eastern Time).
The live webcast of Google's earnings conference call can be accessed at "http://investor.google.com/webcast". The webcast version of the conference call will be available through the same link following the conference call.
About Google Inc. Google's innovative search technologies connect millions of people around the world with information every day. Founded in 1998 by Stanford Ph.D. students Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Google today is a top web property in all major global markets. Google's targeted advertising program provides businesses of all sizes with measurable results, while enhancing the overall web experience for users. Google is headquartered in Silicon Valley with offices throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia. For more information, visit www.google.com.

The much awaited GOOG first quarter financial results are bound to be released on April 17th. This is big news due to the current status lots of companies are reporting loss of earnings. Google one of the largest company in the world need to prove that its still a very popular and profitable company. Current share price of Google is already hovering around 450$ down from 750$. If they show a less than expected earning their shares are bound to tumble much more

Lets wait and see how it goes on,

Labels: Google, pagerank

So how will Google stop spamming and cloaking in blog search

Got to wait and see,

Search Engine Genie.

Labels: Google, Spam

So just to remind everybody, I am visiting the Kirkland office and they said you know what lets grab a video camera and just talk about a few things and have a little bit of fun and put these videos up on the web.

So one of the things that we thought we'll talk about is a snippet, what are the different parts of the snippet? How do we choose which part of the snippet to show and not show?



So since we are up in the specific North West let's talk a little bit about Walkthrough this snippet of starbucks and what that it looks like and talk through the different parts.

Alright the first thing you'll see is the title and that's typically what you set on the title of your webpage. So "starbucks Homepage" is what Starbucks use for www. Starbucks.com. Now in general Google reserves the rights to try to change the snippet and make it as useful as possible for users always doing all kind of different experience. Like is it more helpful to show two dots or three dots, you want to end with dots, you want to start with leading spaces, how do you find the most relevant part of the page? And try to say this is what we should be showing. But the majority of the time you have a great deal of control of how about how things get presented.



So in this case starbucks uses the title "Starbucks Homepage" and just a quick bit of SEO advice for starbucks, "Home page" na a few people might search for that but I might say something like "Starbucks coffee" where people are more likely to search for that okay enough of the free advice for starbucks. The next thing that you see is something that we call as the snippet



So next thing that you see is something that we call has the snippet, "Starbucks coffee company is the leading retail coaster and brand of specially da dad



Now where does that snippet come from? It can come from many different places, suppose for example we weren't able to call the URL, May be for whatever reason it was down and we couldn't get a copy of it, we don't have anything from the page not even the Meta description tag nothing at all. In those cases we sometimes do rely on the open directory project. So starbucks I wouldn't be surprised if it's in the open directory so if we weren't able to call the page we might pull the description form there. Another thing we sometimes do is pull the description from a place within the page. So suppose you got a phonebook and you're looking for somebody's name and the name is way down at the bottom it's a lot more helpful to show that person's name from the bottom of the page and may be a few words from either side of that person's name than it is to show like the first fifty words of the page, so we do try to find the most relevant parts of the page Some times its single snippet, sometimes its multiple parts of the page and combine that together and people are little bit of context that this page is really I am looking for. But neither of these two is at the open directory project or directly from the within the content of page body itself. And in this case I looked into it and view source that this is the Meta description tag.

So we did post on the Google webmasters blog just for a while that how these snippets get picked, and it turned out you can use your own Meta description tag and in many cases that is exactly what we will choose to use as a snippet. But you want to be careful because this is a very fine snippet, but maybe there is some other snippet that can work better. You know people would read it and say oh I really want to click through and find out more about that. You can experiment with different Meta descriptions and see that the one that gets more clicks is the one that works better. But we use several different sources of data when deciding how to pull things together. In this case starbucks is also a company so we show a little + box where if you want you can click the plus box and you can expand and see a stock chart for Starbucks. You can see if they are doing well in the market.



There are a lot of these different options. For example if you are having an address on your page many times it will show a plus box and it will say view a map of and then you can have your address. And we are always looking for new ways to surface interest in data. If you go to google.com/experimental we do have views where you can look at search results on a time lines, search results on a map, you can even see all the search results for images and even measurements. So if you going to search for Koalas or Koala bear, you can say show me the measurements. Then it will show you all the things like oh Koala bears are 20 pounds and stuff like that which is really helpful.



In general or whatever interesting information you have on your page that user will be interested in well try to surface that or show relevant information like stock quote or stuff like that. There is also something like that's a little subtle and unnoticed is that we have bolded the starbucks, that's because someone has queried for starbucks. So often times if you do a query and if those keywords are on the page, well make them bold so that people know what you typed is actually on that page. We know about morphology, we know about synonyms. If you typed in car, we can sometimes return search results that have automobiles. But that wouldn't be bolded, or wouldn't be likely to be bolded and what more likely is whatever you typed in is what's going to be bolded. So in that case it gives you little more information and shows how relevant that page.

Working down a little bit you can see the URL which you are actually going to end on, 12K stands for 12 kilobytes which is relatively small page that means it will load pretty quickly. And then you see the cached links, imagine for example the site is down. May be you are the webmaster of the page and you accidently deleted it, but then you can look at the cache page and you could recover the source of that page, then you could put it back up again. The cache page also has really interesting features. If you click on it, It shows us the last crawled date, you can say ok well today is October 7th look at the cached page and oh we last crawled the page on October 6th then you know how precise the search results are.

Sometimes if we are very precise, then we can show an indicator right on the snippet here below ( next to 12k) that we crawled 17 hours ago to let you know that we are very precise.

Similar Pages shows you related pages to start about may be other businesses or other pages that you might be interested in. And a lot of time if you are logged in to Google you will "NOTE THIS"



If you are a student of if you are doing research it's really handy it works with Google note book and all it does is that it saves this off, as I am doing my research I want to save this result can be able to come back to it and may be aggregate it later and may be aggregate all the stuff together on some research chapter.

And then this is really nice, this is what actually to be a little indented on the snippet. But what we call this is site links. There are a couple of things we need to know about site links. First off, no money is involved. Somebody always asks, "So did starbucks pay some money to get them?" No it's purely algorithmic.



And the second thing is it is purely algorithmic it's not done by hands so it's not like we go to store box and say may be we are interested in store locator and then nutrition and stuff like that. But there is a lot of sophistication going on here for example on this page the title is actually Starbucks Store Locator but you don't need to see that most of the times so we can say store locator and if you look at this page the title is actually like Beverage details and something and in fact the link to that page is nutrition.

So we are sort of selective we try to pick the sort of little description that gives people enough information and make sure where they can say "Oh! The store locator is what I want and I am going to go directly there" or I wanted to find out if I get a Mocha how many calories is that so I can go straight to the nutrition. So it's completely algorithmic and no money is involved in that. And then when we get to the bottom if we have a lot of results for a page may be we show one or two and then we will say you know what may be you want to see more results from Starbucks and what that lets you have is a more diversity so you can see one or two results from starbucks and maybe you want to see other results for that query. That sure helps in clear diversity of that page and at the same time lets you dive deeper if you want to.

So that's a very quick tour on what a Google snippet is. Hopefully it was helpful.

Why we prepared this Video transcript?

We know this video is more than a year old but still there are people who have questions about their site and want to listen from a Search Engine Expert. Also there are millions of Non-English people who want to know what's there in this video so a transcript is something that can be easily translated to be read in other languages. We know there are people with hearing disability who browse our site this is a friendly version for them where they can read and understand what's there in this video

This transcript is copyright - Search Engine Genie.

Feel free to translate them but make sure proper credit is given to Search Engine Genie

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Ok As you can this is the closest I can get to a World Map, Did you know there are 5000 languages spoken across the globe, how many does Google support? Only about a 100 still a long way to go.

Alright, Lets do some more questions. Todd writes in he says Matt I have a question, One of my client is about to acquire a domain name very related to their business and has a lot of links going to it. He basically wants to 301 redirect to the final website and the acquisition. The question is will Google ban or impose a penalty for doing this 301 redirect. In general probably not you should be ok, because you specify its closely related, anytime there is a actual merger of two businesses together, two domains very close to each other do a 301 redirect and merge together its not a problem. However if you are a Music site and you are suddenly getting links from Debt consolidation and online cheap YAHYAHYAH, that should be problem but what now you have planned to do is fine and you should be ok.

Barry writes in "What's the right way to theme a site using directories you put the main keyword in the directory or on the index page? If you are using a directory do you use a directory for each set of keywords?

This is a good question, I think you are thinking too much about your keywords and not about your site , this is just for me I prefer a tree like architecture, so everything branches out even, nice like a branch sort of thing and also it will be good if you are breaking down by topics so if you are selling clothes and you have sweaters as one directory and shoes as an other directory and something like that, if you do something like that what you will end up with is your keywords do end up in directories, So as far the directories vs the actual Html file it doesn't matter with Google screwing up with it, So actually I think if you break it down by topic and make sure that your topic is broken down by keywords. Then I think if your user type of keywords and find your page then you are in pretty Good shape.

Aright Joe writes in, If a Ecommerce site has too many parameters say it has punctuation marks, dots etc and its un index able is it ok to be within Google's guidelines and serve static html pages to Googlebot to index instead. This is something that I will be very careful of because if you end messing this up you will be doing something called cloaking which showing different content to users and different content to Googlebot and you need to show the exact same content to both users and Googlebot. So my advice is to go back to the question I asked about whether or not the parameters in URLs are indexable and unified so that both users and Googlebot see the same user directory. And if you are going to do something like that, definitely that's going to be much better saying that what ever html paying you are going to show to the Googlebot , if users go to that page and if they stay on the same page and not redirected or sent to an other page then you are fine. They need to see the exact same page that Googlebot saw that's the main criteria you got to be careful about that.

John writes in he says "I would like to use AB split testing on the static html pages, will google understand my PHP redirect for what it is or will Google penalize my site for assumption of Cloaking, If there is a problem is there a better way to split test?. That's a Good question if you can I would recommend split test in a area where search engines aren't going to index it. Because when we go to a page and you reload and show different content then it does look a bit strange so if you can please use robots.txt or .htaccess file or something that Googlebot doesn't index it. Saying that I wouldn't do a PHP redirect , I will configure in a server to serve 2 different pages parallel. One thing to be careful about and I touched on this a while ago in a previous session that you should not do anything special for Googlebot just treat it like regular user that's going to be the safest thing in terms of not being treated as cloaking.

And lets wrap up, Todd asks an other question he says hi Matt here is the real question, Ginger or Marian? I am going to go with Marian.

Why we prepared this Video transcript?

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Hello again lets deal with a little more questions, I hope its work lets give it a shot. Raf writes in some comments on Google sitemaps please. He says does updates on sitemaps depend on page view of the site? I feel that's not the case page views are not the factor on how things are undated in sitemaps, you know there are different pieces of data in sitemap so imagine you know there are a file of different sets of data. They could all be updated in different times and in different frequencies and typically they should be updated within days or worst case within weeks however as far as I know it doesn't depend on page views.

Lets deal an other one "What are your basics ideas and recommendations on increasing sites ranking and visibility in Google? " Ok this is a meeting topic definitely a longer issue ok so lets go ahead and dive into it? So Lets go and see the number one thing most people make mistake on SEO is the they don't make the site crawlable. So I want you to look at your site in search engines eyes or user text browsers do something and go back to 1994 and use lynx or something like that. If you could get through your site only in text browser you are going to be in pretty good shape, because most people don't even thing about crawl ability. You want to also see on things like sitemaps on your site or also you can use our sitemaps tools in addition to that once you got your content, content that is good content, content that is interesting, content that is reasonable that's attractive and that will make some actually link to you and then once your site is crawlable then you can go about promoting, marketing, optimization your website. So the main thing that I would advice or thing about the people who are relevant to your niche and make sure they are attracted. So if you are attached to a doctor since you run a medical type of website make sure that doctor knows about that website if he knows about your site it might be appropriate for him to link to your website.

You also should be thinking about a hook some thing that holds your visitors it could be really good content newsletters, tutorials, I was trying to setup all these video stuff trying to make it look semiprofessional and there is tutorial by a company called photo flex something they said here is something like keylike, throw etc and BTW they say you need to by our equipment to do that. That's really really smart, infact another photography site that I went to I saw they syndicated the other site tutorials to add on their website. That could be a great way to get links you can also You should also think on places like reddit, digg, Slashdot you know social networking sites myspace this sort of stuff. Fundamentally you need to have something that sets you apart from the pack once you have something like that you are going to be in very good shape as far as promotion your site is concerned. But the biggest step making sure your site is crawlable after that , making sure you have good content and finally make sure you have a hook which makes people really love a site return to it and really bookmark it.

Alright lets do an other one "what condition asks Bryan to google to use dmoz snippet where there is already a valid meta description on that page. That was a really good question I actually went and asked the Google snippet team hi why does this happen and I am not going to go too much in detail but here is something which you need to think about it. Suppose that you have a page about Christina Aguilera or something like that and your open directory snippet is about Britney spears and if you or your user types in Britney spears that's going to be the best snippet so what I have to say we have something where it goes through the process where it all happens and decides that this document is the best to return here is what I want to say once we selected and scored a document and is ready to be returned to the user on a particular slot on the search engines here is what you are going to say is the open directory snippet or my meta tag is the best match. What the user wants and really typed in so its mostly query dependent, it actually depends on the query the user typed. So you say we think the meta description or the description from the Open Directory project compare and see which is the better ones for the users and in that case say we will go with the ODP descriptions and in other case we will go with the Meta description. Now lets go with the Open Directory Project now if you can if you don't want the description from the Open directory project to show up you can actually use the meta NOODP tag and that will actually tell Google not to use the description tag or title tag from the Open Directory Project. So you sort of have the ability to change things a little bit and choose which things you want to have it happen.

Alright this one is a good one. Laura McKenzie says does Google favor bold or strong tags. In general we probably favor bold a little bit more but just to say it more clear its so slight that I wouldn't really worry about it. When you do it do what ever is best for yours and oh I don't think its going to give a little bit of boost in google or anything like that. Like I said its relatively small so I recommend you do what is best for users and what ever is best for your site and then not worry about that much after that.

I think that's it,

Thank you,

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Labels: search engines, website

"First, I want to make clear, I am not worried about bringing my page rank up at
all, I just want to stop showing up on non-US google results. So this isn't
about SEO.
I have a site serving the SE United States. However, 80% of my
visitors come from Ireland, Israel, China, Japan, Italy, South America, and of
all places, Botswana?
I used some google tool (I can't remember which) that
showed my page rank on non US google indexes varies from 4 to as high as 7.
That would explain the off-continent percentage, because I have a white bar
/ page rank 0 here. So...
1. Is there really a different feed for different
countries?
2.Can I keep google indexing for US users but not others?
3.Is it one googlebot gathering data for all places, or are there different
ones? (That would explain why there is some google-thing on my msg boards every
day. Or there is one google bot and he lives at my place.)
4.To block them
or it, do I have to know the name of every bot and spider by IP or nickname or
whatever?
5.Is that done by htaccess or robots.txt?
"

"Geographic targetting boosts ranking in one region compared to others, but it
doesn't remove a site from foreign search results. My experience is that it has
no greater power than a country TLD like .de for Germany or .fr for France, or
hosting your site on an IP address which is locate in the country to target.
1. Is there really a different feed for different countries?
No, every
Google datacenter can produce the results for all countries and languages in the
world by just changing a few parameters in the search URL. Google tries to sort
the results based on relevancy, matching languages and geographic origin of
incoming links to a site, but in principle every URL can appear in every SERP on
every visitors location. There is no such thing as totally separate feeds.
2.Can I keep google indexing for US users but not others?
3.Is it one
googlebot gathering data for all places, or are there different ones? (That
would explain why there is some google-thing on my msg boards every day. Or
there is one google bot and he lives at my place.)
There is just one
Googlebot crawling for all countries and data centers. If you are on one Google
data center, you are practically speaking in all, because they exchange pages on
the fly. There is even data sharing behind the scenes between different Google
spider technologies. If Googlebot doesn't visit a specific URL but Mediabot
which is used for AdSense ad matching is, the pages fetched by Mediabot may be
examined and used by Googlebot.
There is no way you can block your site from
showing up in Google results for one country and not for others, unless your
site is China related and happens to trigger a filter in Google's China
firewall.
The only way to tackle this reliably is to block the foreign
visitors at your door, i.e. use some form of geo targeting where you map the IP
address of the visitor to a geographical location and allow or deny access based
on that. But geo targeting is not 100% reliable, especially with some larger
ISPs like AOL which use a handful of proxies for all their customers and you may
end up with some foreign visitors slipping through, and worse, a number of
legitimate visitors who can't connect anymore.
My advice is not to fight the
battle against foreign visitors, but to monetize the traffic. Many people are
fighting for traffic and you--wanting to kill 80% of your traffic because it
doesn't match the current content of the site--are really an exception. Why not
monetize this traffic in some way instead of blocking people? This is free
traffic which is in principal targeted audience, based on that they found you
through Google search, and not some form of shady traffic generation scheme.

Labels: Google

Labels: Google, pagerank, pagerank update

So you imagine you have gone to Google images and you type in Cat or Cat's Cache you might get a picture like this, now just to let people know this is wonderful right, here is my cat, Emmy Cutts, here she is a ball of yarn and she loves to play with the yarn that's all really handy. But computers are not great at saying oh this is a picture a cat next to a ball of yarn, so in fact if you go to Google images and go to the Advance search you can't say show me image type faces and we can sort of pick out faces seen from the seen in actions does really very well.



But the general problem of you know, detecting what an image is and been able to describe it, is really really hard; so you shouldn't count on computer being able to do that, instead you can help Google with that. Now let's see what this image might look like, if you look at the right this might be a typical image source "img src - "DSC00042.JPG" you know, you got your image tag, u describe what the source is, here is DSC because it is a digital camera, you know blah blah blah 42.JPG, that doesn't give us lot of information, right? You won't be able to say this is cat with a ball of yarn we don't want to say, here is number that gives a virtually zero information, if you go down a little bit, here is sort of information that we want to show up, you won't be able to say this is Matt's cat, Amy Cutts, with some yarn; right? & you know that's not a lot of words but it adequate describes the scene, it gives you a very clear picture what's going on.

It includes words like yarn, a word like Emmy Cutts, which is all completely relevant to that image and it isn't stuffed with tons of words like cat, cat, cat, feline, lots of cats, cat breeding, cat fur with all sorts of stuffs. So you want to have a very simple description, sort of included with that image; how do you do that? If you look here, "Matt Cat, Emmy, Cutts, with some yarn> you can see this image tag, image source and an ALT tag which stand for alternative text, and if so somebody is using a screen reader, or they can't load the image for a reason, your browser can sow you this alternative text and you know it is very helpful for Google. Now you can see what's going on, different people and people who are interested in accessibility can also get a good description what the image is, you are not spamming; this is a total of 7 words, if u got 200 words in your ALT text, you really don't need a ton of words because 7 is enough to describe a scene pretty well. Right? If you get 20 or 25, that's even getting a little bit out there, 7 is perfectly fine, you are talking whatz going with in the picture itself.



You can also look for alternative tags like tidal and things like that but this is enough to help Google to know whatz going on in the image. You can go in advance, you could think about naming your image something like 'Cat and Yarn.JPG' but we are looking for something light weigh and easy to do, adding an ALT tag is very easy to do and you should pretty much do it in all of your images, it helps your accessibility and it can help us (Google) to understand whatz going on in your image.


Why we prepared this Video transcript?

We know this video is more than a year old but still there are people who have questions about their site and want to listen from a Search Engine Expert. Also there are millions of Non-English people who want to know what's there in this video so a transcript is something that can be easily translated to be read in other languages. We know there are people with hearing disability who browse our site this is a friendly version for them where they can read and understand what's there in this video.

This transcript is copyright - Search Engine Genie.

Feel free to translate them but make sure proper credit is given to Search Engine Genie

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Alright, I am trying to upload the last kick to the Google videos. So we will see how it looks while I am waiting I think I can do a few more questions and see if we can knock a few out I am realizing that with this video camera that I have got I can do about 8 minutes length of video before I get to the 100 megabytes limit then I have to use the client uploader so ill probably make it into chunks of 5 to 8 minutes each.

So Ryan writes - He says can you put us out of some myths where having too many sites on the same server, for having sites on IPs that look similar to each other, but having them include the same Javascript of a different site. In general if you are a average webmaster this is something that I haven't have to worry about. Now I have to tell a story about Tim Mayer and I on a penalty panel. Someone said hey you took all my sites out he said both Google and Yahoo did and I didn't really have that many, so tim saw that guy and asked so how many sites did you have?

And the guy looked little sheepish for a minute and then he said well I had about 2000 sites so well there is a range right? Say if you have 4 or 5 sites and if they are all different themes or different contents you are not in a place where you really need to worry about. But say if you have 2000 sites you ask yourself do you have enough value added content to support 2000 sites the answer is probably not. Its just that if you are a average guy I wouldn't worry about being on the same IP address and I definitely wouldn't worry about being on the same server that is something that everyone does. The last one Ryan asked about Javascript there are a lot of sites that do this, Google adsense is javascript included this is something that is common on the web I don't have to worry about it at all, but now again if you have 5000 sites and you are including the Javascript that does some sneaky redirect then you need to worry but that is something that you do on a few sites that is entirely logical and using Javascript I wouldn't worry at all.

Alright Aaron write in - its kind of interesting question? I am having a hard time understanding the problems that we face when we launch a new country. Typically we launch a new country with millions of new pages at the same time additionally due to our enthusiastic PR team we get tons of backlinks as well as press news during every launch. So they say the last time they did this they didn't do very well they launched a site for Australia and they didn't do very well at all.

Aaron this is a good question primarily because the answer to this somewhat changed since the last time we talked someone asked this question when we were in a conference in New-York and I said just go ahead and launch it you don't have to worry about it , it may look a bit weird but it will be just fine. But I think if you are launching your site will millions of web pages you got to be a little more cautious if you can. In general if you are launching with that many pages its probably better to try and launch a little more softly so a few thousand pages and add a few thousand more and stuff like that it could very well be, millions of pages are a lot of pages. Wikipedia is like say how many 5 or 10 million pages so if you are launching that many pages make sure you find ways to scrutiny and make sure those are all good pages. Or you might as well find yourself not as good as you hoped for.

Alright quick question; classic nation writes in and says What's the status on Google images and whether we will be able to hear about the indexing technology of the future?

Actually there was a thread about this on webmasterworld we just did an index update, just did I think last weekend for Google images, Actually I was talking to someone on the google images team they are always working hard, there is a lot of stuff you may have seen there might be new updates in future where we will be bringing new images that the main index has and stuff like that but they are always working on making Google images index better.

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

Hi everyone again, Alright here we go again I am learning something everytime I do one of these, For example its probably smart to mention today is Sunday July 30^th 2006.

Alright Gerby writes in "Does Googlebot treats dynamic pages different than static pages? " My company writes perl and there are query strings in URLs yahyahyah?

That's a good question, my first opinion we do treat static and dynamic pages equally so let me explain that in a little bit more detail. Pagerank flows in dynamic URLs the same way they flow in static URLs so if you got nytimes linking to a dynamic URL you will get the pagerank benefit and will still flow the Pagerank benefit. There are other search engines in past who said ok we go one level deep from static URLs so we are going to crawl a dynamic URL but we are going to go one level in dynamic URL, so the short answer is pagerank still flows the same between a static and a dynamic URL, lets go into a more detailed answer. The example you gave has like 5 parameters and one of them is like a product ID 2725 and you definitely cant use too many parameters I would recommend 2 or 3 at the most if you opt for using them , not to go for too long numbers because we might confuse them with session IDs any extra parameters you can get rid of its always a good idea. And remember google is not the only search engine out there so say if you have the ability to do a little of Mod_Rewrite I am going to say make it look like a static URL and I am going to say this is a very good way to tackle a problem. But pagerank still flows but experiment if you see any URLs that has the same structure and same number of parameters as you will think of doing its probably better to cut short some number or parameters or shorten them in URLs, or try to use Mod rewrite. Alright Mark writes in this is an interesting question he has a friend who's site was hacked he did not know about for couple of months because of they had taken it out or something like that. So he asks can google notify the webmaster of the site basically when its hacked within sitemaps and inform them maybe say that inappropriate pages were crawled. That's a great question my guess is we don't have the resources to have something like that right now in general if somebody is hacked if they have a small number of sites they monitor, they will get to know about it really quickly, the web host will alert them about it. So webmaster console team is really going to work on new things but my guess is this is really not right now in the priority list.

Ok james says, "Hey Matt , in the fullness of time I am going to use Geo-targeting software one that will give different type of messages to different type of people in different parts of the world. So for example this kind of pricing structure are we safe to use these type of Geo-targeting software clearly we don't want to avoid any suspicions of cloaking. That's a very interesting question, SO lets talk about that a little bit Google webmaster guidelines very clearly says showing different type of content than what you show to Search engines. Geo-targeting by itself is not cloaking under google's guidelines. Because what you are doing take an IP address and hey you are from Canada we will show you this particular page, take the IP address hey you are from Germany we will show you this particular page, this thing that will get you in trouble is if you treat Googlebot as a special guest and do something special for it. So Geo-targeting for Google bot like Googlebotistan is bad. So what you can do is instead just treat Googlebot as a regular user. So if you are targeting by country and if Googlebot is coming from United states just show what people in United states will see so google for example does geo targeting we don't think that's cloaking its all about playing the cards pretty well. So again as I said cloaking is showing different contents to users and different contents to search engines. In this case just treat Googlebot as you treat like any other fact that they got this particular IP address and you should be totally fine.

Alright its time for another break

We know this video is more than a year old but still there are people who have questions about their site and want to listen from a Search Engine Expert. Also there are millions of Non-English people who want to know what's there in this video so a transcript is something that can be easily translated to be read in other languages. We know there are people with hearing disability who browse our site this is a friendly version for them where they can read and understand what's there in this video.

This transcript is copyright - Search Engine Genie.

Feel free to translate them but make sure proper credit is given to Search Engine Genie.

Labels: Mattcutts, Mattcutts Video Transcript, Video Transcripts, Videos

"The web pages we discover in our enhanced crawl do not come at the expense of
regular web pages that are already part of the crawl, so this change doesn't
reduce PageRank for your other pages. As such it should only increase the
exposure of your site in Google. This change also does not affect the crawling,
ranking, or selection of other web pages in any significant way."

Labels: Google, search engines

Here is a small list of conversion rates from the sites we monitor:

We will continue to monitor and will come up with a bigger list in our future
blog post,

Labels: Google Adwords

Labels: Search Engine Optimization, search engines

Labels: Search Engine Optimization, search engines

Dmoz the Mother of all directories is the only directory in the whole internet that is regarded as a favorite by all top Search Engines. For Google sites in Dmoz get a small level of positive score since all the sites accepted in Dmoz are hand picked and reviewed under strict conditions by Dmoz editors.

I have seen this when Dmoz had a official forum named Resource-zone people used to whine and complain that their submission is not accepted. Also people just bash Dmoz in various forums and message boards for giving credit to some sites and accused of Dmoz editors of even taking bribes to get listed sites listed in corresponding category.



From my past experience with getting sites listed in Dmoz I tell you there is no short cut to a listing in Dmoz, also dmoz is the most genuine directory out there and the corruption rate from my analysis and experience is some where around 0.0001%. That is equal to one out of 10,000 Dmoz editors are corrupted. If you see as per the Dmoz blog at any given time there are around 7000 active Dmoz editors. With a corruption rate of 1 out of 10,000 editors I am sure there are no corrupt or cheating editors for dmoz. If you think Dmoz has not accepted your submission stop whining about it and see what are the areas you have problems with your website. Remember today you come to internet and tomorrow you want your site getting listed is not with Dmoz there are more than 1000 cheap zero value directories out there who will list you for nothing ( fact they are good for nothing directories ) . Dmoz likes good quality sites to be listed no Dmoz editor is against listing any site as long it satisfies their quality guidelines.

Dmoz remains to be most comprehensive directory on the web only directory that is anywhere near to it is the Yahoo directory. But still yahoo directory is not the best directory you can come across since its paid. You pay 299$ for review of your site and most of the sites pass through this review but with Dmoz this is not the case you can never buy a listing in Dmoz.



Dmoz is not run for listing all commercial websites. Dmoz is here to provide best value to its visitors. Dmoz editors don't just rely on site submission for entry into Dmoz. Most of the editors are Web Savvy and they score the Internet in search of quality websites and quality articles to list them in their category. In fact some of my previous discussions with some Meta Editors revealed there will be atleast 30% of articles / news / websites / other stuff listed in Dmoz are through Scanning the internet.

So let me get you a checklist on what it takes to get into Dmoz.

1. First and the most important point is Dmoz Quality guidelines make sure your site doesn't violate it. If it does there is no point in even submitting the site to dmoz since it will never be accepted. Some of the guidelines. Duplicate sites - Sites that has mirrors or duplicates and has an exact copy currently running your site cannot get into Dmoz
   Affiliate sites - A site fill with affiliate links and affiliate information will not be accepted into Dmoz. There is no exception for this make sure your site is not a MFA ( Made For Adsense ) or affiliate site.
   Status of Website: Make sure your site is current and that its fully completed an incomplete site when reviewed by a editor will mostly be rejected or will be put in backlog. Its very important that you impress the editor by the first look if the site has pages which says under construction or broken links or incomplete information I am sure your site will never be listed.
   Multi level marketing related websites, Affiliate reseller sites, sites that use cloaking, sites that promote illegal stuff like child pornography, Bootlegs, Warez, pirated software etc are not included in Dmoz
2. Contact Information: Most of the editors see this as a important factor for site credibility most of the time a site without proper verifiable contact information is rejected. Make sure you have the current contact information and that its legitimately visible on the page. It can either be on a contact page or other pages you prefer make sure it is easily accessible when a editor reviews your site.
3. Value for users: See how much value your site will provide for users Dmoz as I said is here to provide best value for users they are not here to list your site which has 50,000 products selling actively online. Say the same site has community areas like forums, reviews etc then your site has more chance of getting listed in Dmoz.
4. Find the right category: This is a very important factor most of time a listing is delayed or rejected if its submitted to the wrong category. Remember Dmoz editors are not paid almost all of them except a top few are all doing work as a volunteer service so make sure you don't trouble them too much. Take time to research be best category. Say suppose you are a Car Dealer in California. Go to Dmoz and type in Car dealer California "http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=car+dealers+california", you will see a lot of sites showing up which are related to the query you submitted. Now just take time and go through some of the categories which showed up for the Search. This particular search is complicated since the categories that came of are too vague. Here are some of the topics that came up.
   Regional: North America: United States: California: Regions: Northern California: Business and Economy Regional: North America: United States: California: Counties: San Joaquin: Business and Economy
   Business: Automotive: Recreational Vehicles: Retailers: North America: United States: California
   
   Above I picked some categories which showed up which looked relevant. Now by look we can eliminate California/counties/san Joaquin since is more specific to a city and you are selling whole of California. Next I can also eliminate Northern California since again you are selling whole of California. So mostly the ideal topic is Retailers/North America/United states/ California. So are you convinced that you can submit here. STOP: Don't do it yet since there might be other categories which never showed up search which can be relevant to your website. So I recommend now going through the regular way, Just click the categories and browse and see if you can find any other category that is relevant to your site if you are convinced that there cannot be any more category relevant to your website then proceed to submission.
5. Submission Guidelines: Make sure you have a well written title tag and a good descriptive description tag. Always avoid the idea of a optimized title tag. There is nothing like that for Dmoz. Most of the time best title will be your company name itself. For example if your company is California Auto Dealers Inc then that will be the best title for your website. When it comes to writing description make sure you don't read it like a advertisement, don't stuff your keywords in it don't repeat your title, prices etc. Best description will be something which doesn't fall into any of the categories that is pointed out here in Dmoz submission guidelines. http://www.dmoz.org/guidelines/describing.html
6. Multiple listings: Sometimes Multiple listings are allowed for example you can submit your site if you eligible for the main category as well as your regional sub category. This is rare research before you do this.
7. Patience: After you submit your site please wait. Wait for atleast a year before any sort of panic there could be 1000 behind the scene reasons for your site not listed. If your site is not listed find out whether you have anything that violate Dmoz guidelines if you find anything just fix it and keep waiting. Don't go an resubmit all resubmissions will make your existing submission being pushed to the bottom of the website backlog. If the category you submitted has 100s of websites waiting then your wait time will be longer best option is to be patient and wait.
8. Finally stop talking bad about Dmoz or bashing them in forums this is one of the most important thing they see. Dmoz editors are some of the most active members of internet and they will find you regardless of which forum or message board you are bashing them. Stop false accusations against Dmoz they are the best out there. Just for the sake of backlinks don't ever try anything like shoemoney did here (shoemoney.com/2007/08/26/dmoz-extortion/ ) . Your site will never get into Dmoz for atleast the next 100 years.
9. P.S: See if your site really qualifies to be listed in Dmoz. If your site is listed in Dmoz does it add atleast a small value to dmoz. I will personally see that before submitting to Dmoz if you are new to internet and just build a site take time for the site to grow make it best for your users work atleast 6 months on the site. Once you feel you are good enough submit to Dmoz this increases the chance of acceptance into Dmoz more easily.
   
   Lets all make Dmoz a better place to be.
   Some Good resources : http://blog.dmoz.org
   http://www.resource-zone.com/forum/
   
   Search Engine Genie.
   

Labels: Search engine directories

Labels: Search Engine Optimization

1. Blog Spamming: Spamming blog with comment spam most targeted sites were big University sites like Stanford.edu where they allowed people to post comment for their articles or news section
2. Aggressive / Automated Link exchanges: Aggressive Link exchanges were still working but not to the level it used to work around 2002 or 2003. Automated link exchanges became a huge industry and people were using very aggressive link exchanges to gain a upper hand in backlinks
3. Forum spamming: Spamming forums through signature links , links in their posts, links through automated forum spam etc. This was a very popular tactics where people just visit forums to have their links in signature or in their post to gain search engine benefit.
4. Cross-linking: A major search engine spam where a spammer starts 100s of sites and cross link them to get link benefit in search engines.
5. Dmoz clones: Huge number of dmoz clones started arising and became people since it can generate 100s of 1000s of pages instantly for search engines.
6. Directory spam huge number directories started coming out with zero value to visitors built just for search engine benefit
7. Links from lots of blogs. This was something which came into existing in 2004 but still in existence to a certain extent.
8. Links and contents hidden on page, behind images, in noscript tag, in hidden contents etc.
   
9. Spamming wikipedia by inserting links ( Nofollow was introduced mostly for wikipedia ) .
   
10. Text link ads: Buying your way to the top of search engine organic rankings. Buying text links and gaining search engine benefit due to the search engines dependency on backlinks and anchor text power to rank a website.
    

If I list it out I can keep on listing lots of things people used for spamming the search engines. But if you today most of the above tactics dont work anymore with search engines. Search engine like Google has closed its algorithm for these sort of loop holes. I can tell you with some sort of background with search algorithms. Just to close the above 8 tactics they need to implement 30 different factors. Its not that easy to detect a spam without hurting millions of websites out there who might have something similar to it but is not considered spam.



To combat these problems search engines role our algorithmic changes very carefully after a lot of testing so that it doesn't affect any search rankings of innocent webmasters who never did anything against search engine guidelines. At this point I can imagine atleast 150 factors playing into ranking competitive keywords in Google.

Lets see what's the 2007/2008 search engine spam tactic

Social bookmarking which has picked up so much these days has been a target of search engine spamming for sometime now. People want to bookmark only interesting pages but now everyone bookmarks everything. This is done mostly for search engine benefit. Search engines love sites like delicious or Digg and they tend to crawl links from these sites better. So people tend to target these sites.

Search Engine Spamming in the name of link baiting, Link baiting a very commonly used word these days has been a subject of abuse. People imagining to be creative use some really aggressive methods on their sites to gain natural backlinks. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't . Bad PR ( public relations ) is a main problem here. People tend to write crap about others or about other sites so that they can gain the sympathy of the other party. This is definitely not the healthy way for gaining back links.

Pay per post , pay for blogging – an other tactic which was subject to spamming . Now people are buying posts in blogs. They make good bloggers write about their site and provide a back link to them. Most of the time this is just like a paid text link advertisement.

Adding a page on a established site about your site with anchor text backlinks

Reviews on established blogs are similar to Pay per post where you pay a blogger to review your site and link back in return for Money.

1$ articles – This is a very difficult to combat spam where advertisers are paying 1$ for articles which are of very low quality and stuff their site with junk information to show search engines that they have contents.

This is just a small list of new ideas to spam search engines. I can go on to list more so we cannot blame the search engines in anyway for doing something like this.

One wonderful thing is the death of Anchor Text link advertising in 2007/2008. I am personally Happy about it. It makes the rich and famous dominate Search Results. Its not anymore the case. Search Engines dont see text link advertising as a search engine friendly one and are ready to impose strong penalties for sites that buy or sell links. Though Search engines like Google like to fight search engine spamming algorithmically I am sure some manual review especially on paid links or renting links will bring more success and quality to the index.

Considering all these new tactics coming up I am sure in future Search Engine Optimization is going to be one of the hardest industry to work on. Saying that if there are no innovating ideas to get a site ranked I am sure search engine quality engineers will go Jobless. So let us keep them working harder to fight search engine spamming algorithmically.

Search Engine Genie.

Labels: search engines

Labels: search engines

Update: Tools are working perfectly fine Google has released the block on online tools.

Labels: SEO Tools

Labels: search engines

"Hi,I am trying to submit my .asia domains that I have registered and I
keep getting error messages. (error 3) My new .com domains go through fine. Any
ideas or reason why I cannot get my .asia domains entered for a crawl?"

Please let us know your site URL or your y_key contents and we'll be happy
to investigate.

Labels: Google

Labels: Search Engine Optimization

Reasons for Google not catching a page: A SEO checklist for Google's cache problem

1. If a page is password protected and the search engines cannot access it but find many links coming to it they will keep the URL in search results but there wont be any cache since the page cannot be accessed by Googlebot.
2. If the page is too large for indexing we discussed this before in our blog Googlebot has problem caching large pages. For example large PPT, large PDFs or large Docs are not cached by Google. From our research they have a indexing limit of 1.5 Mb and I have personally not seen a page more than that being cached again understand indexing and caching are two different things I am discussing about indexing only here.
3. If a page has errors and not rendering properly for Googlebot they fail to index that page. This might sometimes happen with dynamic pages some servers when the Googlebot is visiting might not render the page problem and this will result in Googlebot not caching the page.
4. If you are suffering from a page penalty then it will affect page caching.
   Also if Googlebot has not visited a page for a long time but the page is still in index it will loose its credibility in the index and will loose the cache.
5. Accidental blocking of a page in robots.txt or in Meta tags will stop search engines from caching a page. For example the Nocache meta tag syntax will tell the search engine robot not to cache the web page.

Labels: Google

Labels: search engines

What caused indexed pages to disappear: A SEO checklist for problems with
indexed pages

1. A page can disappear if Google finds something wrong with that page we discussed about this on page specific Google penalty here.
2. A page can disappear when suddenly it attracts 1000s of backlinks. This might suddenly trigger a filter with Search engine algorithms and that page might go through a strong search engine spam filter and once it clears it will be available again.
3. If a page has any server related problems and not accessible by search engines it will disappear from search engine index
4. If a page has problems with the html or dynamic code and again not properly rendering for the search engines it will be booted temporarily from the index.
5. If a page has hidden links and if detected by spam detecting Googlebot it will assigned a temporary penalty and will be booted from the index.
6. Manual review by certain search engines have made pages disappear. This is though very rare but it does happen and search engines do this to make sure users are not led to the wrong page.

Labels: Google

Labels: Google

Labels: Google

Labels: Yahoo

Dear Google AdWords Customer,
Please sign in to your account at https://adwords.google.com/select/login
, and update your billing information. Your account will be reactivated as soon
as you update your payment information.Your ads will show immediately if you
decide to pay for clicks via creditor debit card. If you decide to pay by direct
debit, we may need to receiveyour signed debit authorization before your ads
start running, depending on your location. If you choose bank transfer, your ads
will show as soon as we receive your first payment.
We look forward to
providing you with the most effective advertising
available.
Sincerely,
———————————————————————————-
The Google AdWords
Team

Please be aware that lot of people lost their personal information and money to phishing scams. If you find a email on this scam forward to adwords-support@google.com

Labels: Google Adwords

You are NOT suppose to promote or encourage provide service for
writing thesis, academic paper writing, prewritten Academic
aids advertising for applying for exam on behalf of
someone else.

Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of products designed to help
someone pass a drug test. This includes products such as drug cleansing shakes
and urine test additives.

Different countries have different laws when it comes to alcohol ads. US don't
allow hard alcohol ads and countries like India bans all alcohol ads. Wine and
champagne are restricted in some areas.

Advertising steroid related produced for Muscle enhancement is strictly
prohibited.

This is targeting Google itself. This destroys search engine's natural tendency
to send potential leads to sites. Automated ad clicking ads are banned.

Bulk email marketing, EMail marketing software and non-opt in lists are banned
from advertising.

Dailers are mostly malwares or spywares which try to connect to a premium number
and you will be charged huge if you are not aware of what's happening.

Don't promote drugs and drug paraphernalia.

In the past one year e-currencies especially egold have become very popular in
Nigeria. E-gold is an electronic currency backed by real gold stored up in a
bullion somewhere in the United States and accounted for by weight. E-gold was
established by Douglas Jackson in 1996.
E-gold is used as a medium of
exchange on the net. Many businesses now accept e-gold as a form of payment for
their services or products all over the world. Our very own Nigeria caught the
bug about a year ago with people using it especially to fund their forex trading
accounts, hyip programs and muli-level marketing programs.
The main
attraction perhaps for Nigerians is the fact that the process of opening and
operating an e-gold account takes just a few minutes and verification is never
required unlike payment systems like paypal.
Another controversial feature of
the egold system is their non-repudiation policy which regards all spends as
being final. There are no charge-backs with egold. To fund an egold account, all
a user has to do is find an Independent exchanger whom he pays cash in exchange
for his egold account to be funded.
The two features of e-gold stated above
has made it a preferred medium of operation by fraudsters. The fact that no
verification is needed and that once the egold gets into their account, it can't
be retrieved makes the system a perfect one for fraudsters. These limitations
notwithstanding, millions of people all over the world have continued to use the
system.
With its growing popularity in Nigeria, the egold system gradually
became a target of fraudulent activities by criminally minded Nigerians. Today,
egold fraud in Nigeria has become an issue. Perhaps it is the next level of
internet fraud in Nigeria.

Don't promote fake documents.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion
of false documents such as fake IDs, passports, social security cards,
immigration papers, diplomas, and noble titles.

Don't promote fireworks or pyrotechnic devices.
Advertising is not permitted
for the promotion of fireworks and pyrotechnic devices.

Don't promote online gambling or related sites.
Advertising is not
permitted
for the promotion of online casinos and gambling activities.
This includes,
but is not limited to, the following:
sports books
lotteries
bingo
poker
sites that provide tips, odds, and
handicapping
software
facilitating online casinos and gambling
gambling tutoring online
gambling related eBooks
'play for fun'
gambling or casino games of skill
including sites where the primary
purpose
is 'play for fun' gambling
affiliate sites with the primary
purpose of
driving traffic to online
gambling sites

Hacking and Cracking sites;

Google has always been against hacking and cracking sites. its illegal to promote a hacking website in Google Adwords. Sites if found will immediately be banned. You can actually find Hacking and Cracking sites in Organic results though since its very difficult to filter sites in Organic results.

Miracle Cures
Don't promote miracle cures.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of miracle cures, such as 'Cure cancer overnight!'

Mobile Subscription Services
Mobile subscription sites must display the required service details.

Prescription Drugs and Related Content
The promotion of prescription drugs and related content is restricted.
Google AdWords only accepts pharmaceutical advertising from pharmacies that are based in the U.S. or Canada. Pharmacy-related ad campaigns can only target the U.S., U.S. territories (American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands), and/or Canada. Ads for prescription drugs will not be displayed in other countries. Additionally, Google AdWords requires all online pharmacy advertisers and affiliates to be a member of the PharmacyChecker Licensed Pharmacy Program. Ads ill not run until a valid PharmacyChecker identification number is provided.
Note that pet pharmacies and affiliates advertising pet prescription drugs when targeting the U.S. or Canada must also be PharmacyChecker approved.

Prostitution
Don't promote prostitution.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of prostitution.
Scams/Phishing for Personal Information
Don't use phishing or other scamming tactics.
Advertising is not permitted for sites collecting sensitive personal information or money with fake forms, false claims, or unauthorized use of Google Trademarks. Examples of personal information include email addresses, user names, passwords, and/or payment information.

Template Sites for Ad Networks
Don't promote template sites for ad networks such as AdSense.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of template sites for ad networks. This includes products and services that create template or pre-generated websites solely intended to profit from ads.
Tobacco and Cigarettes
Don't promote tobacco and cigarettes.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of tobacco or tobacco-related products, including cigarettes, cigars, tobacco pipes, and rolling papers.
Traffic Devices
Don't promote illegal traffic devices.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of radar jammers, license plate covers, traffic signal changers, and related products.
Weapons
The promotion of weapons is restricted.
Advertising is not permitted for the promotion of certain weapons, such as firearms, firearm components, ammunition, balisongs (switchblades), butterfly knives, and brass knuckles.

Labels: Google Adwords

"Announcing Google Weblogs (beta)
Today we'd like to offer you a sneak
peek at an exciting new product we've been working on: Google Weblogs. Since
Google bought Pyra Labs in 2002, we've been dreaming, planning, and implementing
the next revolution in personal publishing: Google Weblogs. Google
Weblogs, or "GWeblogs," or "Gblogs," which will launch later this year in a
public beta, is the next revolution in personal publishing. Here's what you can
expect:
Don't limit yourself to "reverse chronological" publishing. Our
advanced Google algorithms put your best content at the top of your blog. Even
if your later work goes downhill your previous posts will still shine.
No
more template languages to mess with or sidebars to get right. Our advanced
Google algorithms automatically populate your blog's sidebar with the most
relevant possible content.
Stop worrying about your PageRank or your search
engine optimization. Post directly into Google search results for maximum
visibility.
Save your readers time and effort. We'll automatically extract
the most relevant sentence from your post for the index page, along with any
necessary ellipsis. We'll also put some words in bold!
Your blog's header
will stay fresh with new images from our team of artists, each and every
anniversary of a scientific achievement.
Unsure of what to post about? Just
click "I'm Feeling Lucky" and we'll "take care" of the rest!"

Labels: Google

Google (nasdaq: GOOG )'s stock rose $17.99, or 4 percent, to $473.27 among early trading on Friday after Analyse Jeffery Lindsay predicted higher sales and revenue for Google from its search engine advertising programmes. Lindsay said after Google's new approach to AdWords its sales will be increasing in the coming Months.

According to Lindsay Google has been slapping low quality advertisers from their AdWords advertising platform which gives opportunities for reforms to the AdWords campaign. Com score a leading company which tracks clicks in search engines reported lesser number of clicks in February and march but Lindsay says this is mostly due to Google slapping lower bidding advertisers and increasing its price facilitating for higher advertisers. Google has been changing and increasing its AdWords bid prices for a long time and according to Lindsay Com score don't record all these information.

Linday also predicts Google's shares might rise as high as 750$,

Source:forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/04/04/ap4856278.html

Labels: Goog

Labels: Google, Google update

Labels: Search Engine Optimization

Labels: Search Engine Marketing

How are you planning to reach Mars?

During the first couple of decades Virgle will use standard technology of the day - chemical rockets to ferry cargo and crews to Mars. As the bootstrap plan stands today, in order to reach Mars (once the tri-module is assembled in LEO) the Virgle 1's cruise stage will start a burn for insertion into a lunar trajectory and then back toward Earth for final insertion into a modified Hohmann Transfer Orbit. This multi-day round trip will use a variant of the Oberth effect, the Krasnokutskaya periapsis maneuver, to increase the final Earth-to-Mars transfer velocity through a periapsis delta-v burn performed at the closest lunar and subsequent Earth approach, with the additional delta v gained on account of the potential energy from the mass of expended propellant. The total useful mass sent this way to Mars will be 569 metric tons, meaning (obviously) that it will take four launches to complete the assembly. The design does allow for easy reconfiguration for varying payload capacities and transfer duration times. This round trip is also a final test and verification of the cruise configuration, assuring mission support that all systems are running within their nominal values. The design also provides for several orbital abort modes, decreasing significantly the probability of any mission losing a payload, human or otherwise.