<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="https://www.searchenginegenie.com/blog-seo/how-google-evaluates-search-google-engineer-talks/"></g:plusone></div>
<div style="display:inline;float:right;margin-left:1em"><g:plusone href="https://www.searchenginegenie.com/blog-seo/how-google-evaluates-search-google-engineer-talks/"></g:plusone></div>
{"id":591,"date":"2008-09-17T16:09:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-17T20:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/how-google-evaluates-search-google-engineer-talks\/"},"modified":"2012-09-20T01:49:20","modified_gmt":"2012-09-20T05:49:20","slug":"how-google-evaluates-search-google-engineer-talks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/how-google-evaluates-search-google-engineer-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"How google evaluates search &#8211; Google engineer talks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>How google evaluates search:<\/p>\n<p>Scott of Google has given a good insight of how Google evaluates search results: Look at this to get a good idea on how Google handles search evaluation:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Evaluating search is difficult for several reasons.<\/p>\n<ul id=\"yygm20\">\n<li id=\"yygm24\" style=\"margin-left: 15px;\">First, understanding what a user really  wants when they type a query &#8212; the query&#8217;s &#8220;intent&#8221; &#8212; can be very difficult.  For highly navigational queries like [ebay] or [orbitz], we can guess that most  users want to navigate to the respective sites. But how about [olympics]? Does  the user want news, medal counts from the recent Beijing games, the IOC&#8217;s  homepage, historical information about the games, &#8230; ? This same exact  question, of course, is faced by our ranking and search UI teams. Evaluation is  the other side of that coin.\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"yygm27\" style=\"margin-left: 15px;\">Second, comparing the quality of search  engines (whether Google versus our competitors, Google versus Google a month  ago, or Google versus Google plus the &#8220;letter T&#8221; hack) is never black and white.  It&#8217;s essentially impossible to make a change that is 100% positive in all  situations; with any algorithmic change you make to search, many searches will  get better and some will get worse.\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"yygm27\" style=\"margin-left: 15px;\">Third, there are several dimensions to  &#8220;good&#8221; results. Traditional search evaluation has focused on the <i>relevance  <\/i>of the results, and of course that is our highest priority as well. But  today&#8217;s search-engine users expect more than just relevance. Are the results  fresh and timely? Are they from authoritative sources? Are they comprehensive?  Are they free of spam? Are their titles and snippets descriptive enough? Do they  include additional UI elements a user might find helpful for the query (maps,  images, query suggestions, etc.)? Our evaluations attempt to cover each of these  dimensions where appropriate.\n<\/li>\n<li id=\"yygm30\" style=\"margin-left: 15px;\">Fourth, evaluating Google search quality  requires covering an enormous breadth. We cover over a hundred locales  (country\/language pairs) with in-depth evaluation. Beyond locales, we support  search quality teams working on many different kinds of queries and features.  For example, we explicitly measure the quality of Google&#8217;s spelling suggestions,  universal search results, image and video searches, related query suggestions,  stock oneboxes, and many, many more.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Source: Google Blog: <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">http:\/\/googleblog.blogspot.com\/2008\/09\/search-evaluation-at-google.html <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How google evaluates search: Scott of Google has given a good insight of how Google evaluates search results: Look at this to get a good idea on how Google handles search evaluation: &#8220;Evaluating search is difficult for several reasons. First, understanding what a user really wants when they type a query &#8212; the query&#8217;s &#8220;intent&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-google"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=591"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1129,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591\/revisions\/1129"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.searchenginegenie.com\/blog-seo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}