Origin of orkut, Thursday, February 26, 2009


A guy was traveling with his girlfriend in the train. Train meets with an accident. This guy searched his girlfriend everywhere but in vain. This guy grew up to become an IT technical architect. He hired many IT developers so that he can develop a software with them while will help him to find his girlfriend through the web. As thought, he was able to find her after losing millions of dollars and 3 long years. While, he was deciding to shut down his search operation, the CEO of Google met him and took over the application. The application was able to make a profit of 1billion dollar in the first year. This software made a whooping profit of 1 billion in its first year. The name of the software is known as orkut.

The name of the guy is orkut Buyukkokten. He gets a large amount from Google. He will become one of the richest men by 2009. Some more interesting facts about this guy are whenever a person opens an account in Orkut he gets $12 from google and when you add somebody in your friend's list he gets $10. For even small things he gets paid. Google pays him as follow: $5 if you scrap someone and $4 when someone scraps you. For loading each photograph he gets $200. When you become someone's fan he gets $2 and when someone becomes your fan he is paid $1.5. When you logout of orkut he is paid $1. He gets $0.5 each if you change your profile photograph or when you read your friend's scrap-book or when you visit your friend's friend list.

posted by power @ 5:23 AM permanent link   |

Post a Comment

|

0 comments
Definition of Open Source, Thursday, February 19, 2009

The term "Open source" does not just represent right to use the source code. The distribution terms of open-source software has a necessity to meet the terms with the subsequent standards:


  • Redeployment without charge

  • The certificate does not limit anyone from advertising or giving away the software as a module of a combined software distribution encloses programs from numerous different sources. The license does not entail a fee or other payment for such sale.

  • Source Code

  • The program should consist of source code. It has to permit sharing of source code in compiled form. If some form of a product is not circulated with source code, there must be a fine revealed means of how to obtain the source code for a rational reproduction cost preferably, downloading via the Internet without charge. The format of source code must be like a programmer can be able to alter the program. Intermediate forms like output of a preprocessor or translator are not permitted.

  • Derived Works

  • The warrant must let them to make any modifications and derived works. It should permit them to be distributed the software under the similar conditions as the license of the original software.

  • Reliability of the Author's Source Code

  • The license possibly will confine source-code from being distributed in customized form only if the license agrees to distribute "patch files" with the source code for the intention of transforming the program at build time. The license must openly allow distribution of software built from modified source code. The license may need derived works to bring out different name or version number from the original software.



  • No inequity against Persons or Groups

  • The license is required to distinguish beside any person or group of persons.

  • No favoritism against Fields of Endeavor

  • The license should not put a ceiling on making use of the program in a particular field of endeavor. For instance, it may not confine the program from being used in a trade, or from being used for genetic observations.

  • Distribution of License

  • The rights enclosed to the program should be relevant to all to whom the program is rearranged with no need for implementation of an additional license by those parties.



  • License should Not Be precise to a Product

  • The rights attached to the program should be unique. It should not depend on other program's which is part of a particular software distribution.

  • License Must Not Restrict Other Software

  • The authorization should not put limitations on other software that is distributed in conjunction with the licensed software. For instance, the license should not claim that all other programs distributed on the similar medium ought to be open-source software.



  • License Must Be Technology-Neutral

  • No stipulation of the license may be predicated on any individual technology or style of interface.

posted by power @ 9:34 PM permanent link   |

Post a Comment

|

0 comments
This site may harm your computer, Tuesday, February 3, 2009

If you do a Google search between 6:30 a.m. PST and 7:25 a.m. PST this morning, you probably saw this following message "This site may harm your computer" accompanied each and every search result. This was obviously an error, and Google were very sorry for the trouble caused to all their users.

What happened? Very merely, human error. Google flags search results with this message "This site may harm your computer" if the site is called to install malevolent software in the background or otherwise slyly. We do this to guard our users against visiting sites that could damage their systems. Google maintain a list of such sites through both physical and automated methods. Google work with a non-profit known as StopBadware.org to come up with criterion for maintaining this list, and to offer simple processes for webmasters to take their site from the list.

Google sporadically updates that list and released one such update to the site this morning. Unluckily (and here's the human error), the URL of '/' was incorrectly checked in as a value to the file and '/' enlarges to all URLs. Opportunely, their on-call site reliability team found the problem rapidly and reverted the file. As we push these updates in a reeled and rolling fashion, the errors began appearing in this particular duration i.e. 6:27 a.m. and 6:40 a.m. and began disappearing amid 7:10 and 7:25 a.m., so the duration of the problem for any meticulous user was roughly about 40 minutes.

Google thanked their team for their quick work in finding this and they also apologized to all their users due to the inconvenience caused to them this morning and also to their site owners whose pages where incorrectly labeled. Google said that they will carefully interrogate this incident and put more robust file checks in place to avert it from taking place again.

posted by power @ 2:21 AM permanent link   |

Post a Comment

|

0 comments