Full Chat transcript of the Live chat session between webmasters
and Google webmaster central team. This is a Raw unedited version
we are inprocess of picking some quality answers from this but its
gonna take a week and we dont want to delay in reaching this file
to you. We took all our best effort to get this to all webmasters
around the world. Thought difficult to navigate due to the massive
size more than 700 lines you will be able to pick good answers if
you see posts from Matt Cutts ( Google's Senior Quality Engineer
) , Adam Lasik ( Google Tech Evangelist ) etc.
Prepared by Search
Engine Genie Team,
You not only see Google experts but there are some pretty good
SEO industry experts who have taken part in this large discussion.
Enjoy the script and feel free to leave
feedback or comments in this post
- Wysz to
All Participants:Hello, webmasters!
- from John Mueller to All Participants:Hi
everyone!
- Matt Cutts to All Attendees:Howdy,
everybody. :)
- MattD to All Participants:Welcome
to the chat. We're working on the permissions right now.
- from MattD to All Participants:Looks
like the Q&A portion will be working soon. It's separate from
this chat box.
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:Hey
everyone
- from jtbandes to All Participants:Chat
is working now, it seems :)
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:we
should be be starting soon :)
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:and
yep, jtbandes, chat is working
- from vijay to aaron (privately):hello aaron , are you aaron
from SEObook
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Hello
people
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:We
should be starting in just a few minutes...
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:Hello
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:Hello
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Looks
like chat to "All Participants" is working now..
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:hey
everyone
- from cristina wood to All Participants:hi
all :)
- from Rey Colon to All Participants:Whats
up to all my SEO People
- from Laurent to All Participants:Bonjour
tout le monde
- from Cassiano Travareli to All
Participants:hello everyone
- from John Jones to All Participants:Hello
Barry glad to see you on this chat. Can't wait to see what highlights
you write later today and maybe tomorrow. :-)
- from jimbeetle to All Participants:hi
folks
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:Hello
everyone :)
- from Anderson to All Participants:hi
everyone
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:i
have to write highlights?
- from Laurent to All Participants:this
is very exciting
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants::)
- from vijay to All Participants:Hello
Everyone, Good to see you people ere,
- from Marjory Meechan to All Participants:Hello
- from John Jones to All Participants:Barry
- Well you have to copy and paste quotes and add your valuable
thoughts on the matter.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:can
someone say something on the phone so we know ur there
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Barry,
you could just do lowlights
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:okay,
ill take notes
- from Anderson to All Participants:now
it is working
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:Ditto:
can someone say something on the phone so we know ur there
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:google
reader interfers with webex
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:Hello
- from Mark to All Participants:hi
everyone
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:in
fact, Matt Cutts, tell Google Reader people they have a major
delay
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:something
is wrong today
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Is
this the Yahoo webmaster chat?
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:yay
- from Korpis, LLC to All Participants:Hello
All Webmasters!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:hey
john h!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:spam
the Q&A!
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Hi
Barry
- from Manish to All Participants:hi
all
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Do
not spam the Q&A. :)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:oh,
my bad, :)
- from Manish to All Participants:hi
matt gud to see u ehere
- from Jeremy Rivera to All Attendees:Howdy guys
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:camera?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:where?
- from jtbandes to All Participants:I
don't see one eitherfrom Phil Peterman to All Attendees:oh god,
I'm blind
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:No
camera for me. :(
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:we
dont see u
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:video
option is turned off
- from John Honeck to All Participants:I
have video, I think JohnMueller fell asleep
- from Rey Colon to All Participants:I
have video
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:where
do you see the video option?
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:so
it's just some of us that are blind
- from jtbandes to All Participants:apparently
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:hmm
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:ill
close out and reopen
- from John Honeck to All Participants:I
had to click the Panels, then the arrow to open it
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:tell
us if it works
- from Evan to All Participants:Sometimes
the video does not work on macs.
- from jtbandes to All Participants:that
doesn't account for everyone though
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:yeah,
I'm on WinXP
- from John Honeck to All Participants:A/S/PR?
- from Caleb Queern to All Participants:Are
we allowed to submit our questions for Q&A yet?
- from Laurent to All Participants:Could
you post the URL of the site ?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Caleb,
I'd go ahead and submit if you have a Q for the Q&A.
- from jtbandes to All Participants:pictureline.com
is what I heard them say
- from Caleb Queern to All Participants:Thanks
Matt
- from jtbandes to All Participants:It's
pretty..
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:let
me try firefox :)
- from Laurent to All Participants:thanks
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Yup,
pictureline.com is the site that I'm checking out. :)
- from Laurent to All Participants:Yes
no camera for me (Mac)
- from John to All Participants:I'm
on Firefox as well
- from Gary Campbell to All Participants:Can
you push us to the website or screencast it ?
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:I'm
on FF, no video
- from Wysz to All Participants:We
are looking at www. pictureline.com today
- from jtbandes to All Participants:Safari
(mac), no video
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:I'm
not sure that we can screencast the url, but we're looking at
it.
- from John Honeck to All Participants:no
need for the www ;( whoops
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:ok,
in FireFox I see the shared brower
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:no
video yet
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:ha,
i saw all his email
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:Note
that the system req's for webex list Firefox 2 and a slew of Safari
versions as supported, so that shouldn't be an issue
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:where
would i see the video?
- from jtbandes to All Participants:How
many people are getting video? Press "yes" above so
we can see
- from John Honeck to All Participants:wow,
whatever they just did messed everything up
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:John,
in the lower right there are orange buttons to see the chat, participants,
etc.
- from Lee to All Participants:I
can see the space image but have no sound?
- from Jay to All Participants:Please
restate the URL thanks
- from jtbandes to All Participants:pictureline.com
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:pictureline.com
- thanksfrom Barry Schwartz to All
Participants:okay, again, so where would the video
be if I saw it? :)
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:not
seeing the lower right buttons.
from jtbandes to All Participants:nope,
no buttons
- from John to All Participants:I
lost my video
- from Kiowa to All Participants:Are
we supposed to see the site in the interface?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:what
was that?
- from jtbandes to All Participants:no
idea
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:i
m back 2 the chat panel
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:We
moved from screencasting back to the normal interface.
- from Anderson to All Participants:ok
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:ok
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:I'd
say for everyone to just look at pictureline.com in their own
browser.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:lol
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:anyone
having trouble with verifying site on google's website tools?
- from Ian M to All Participants:They
have the non-www vs www issue :)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:linda,
its a problem google is fixing
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
if my site was removed and i need to be able to verify to re-submit
my site, how do i do that?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:linda,
more details at http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/016705.html
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
it's a google issue and not our issue?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:most
likel
- Schwartz to All Participants:
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:well
our website disappeared from google completely. how do i get it
back on or is this a glitch?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:ah,
then that isnt goodfrom Linda
- Farm to All Participants:tell
me about it. any ideas?
- from Rhea Drysdale to All Participants:linda,
disappeared from serps or webmaster central... if serps something
else is going on
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:serps
- from Ian M to All Participants:Reinclusion
request... but check no spamming happened firstrps something else
is going on
- from MattD to All Participants:Linda,
can you give me your site?
- from Rhea Drysdale to All Participants:eh,
find problem, fix and then reinclusion
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:www.laborlawcenter.com
- from Ian M to All Participants:e.g.
if you hired someone to do SEO
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:PLEASE
HELP
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:yea,
not good http://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.laborlawcenter.com
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:I
can't resubmit for reinclusion because the verifying is not working
on google tools
- from Ian M to All Participants:pictureline.com
also has index.php dup content e.g. pictureline.com/index.php
vs pictureline.com/
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:verify
will work soon, i think
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:it
was just working on wednesday, now it's goneplease use our website
as an example for today on how to get your site relisted. good
topic everyone wants to know
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
not to turn this into a "review my site forum", so let's
take just your case and not do general reviews for everyone.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:But
for your site, I have bad news. Looks like you might have gotten
hacked.ur case and not do general reviews for everyone.
- f rom Matt Cutts to All Participants:But
for your site, I have bad news. Looks like you might have gotten
hacked.
- from Laurent to All Participants:I
see more and more proxies getting indexed; creating dup content
with pages. Are you going to get them out of the index ?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Looking
on my side, we sent you a message about the site in our webmaster
message center.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Check
out blog.laborlawcenter.com/2006/08/03/colorado-mileage-reimbursement-law
- from Ian M to All Participants:Are
they talking about pictureline.com still?
- from Doug to All Participants:Matt
would it be possible to take a look at vacationrealty.com. I would
greatly appreciate it
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:As
of a day or so ago, you had hidden text/links such as Discount
Generic Tenuate Online Tenuate Tenuate No Prescription Tenuate
Diet Pills Buy Tenuate Cod No Rx For Tenuate Tenuate Cheap Ohio
Buy Cheap Tenuate Tenuate Buy Diet Pills Tenuate Tenuate 25mg
Tenuate Dospan 75mg Tenuate Dospan Online Buy Tenuate Dospan Online
Buy Tenuate
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:Ian-
yes
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:i
cant see the video
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:whatz
the procedure for thayt
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:So
the short answer is that you may have been hacked.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:ouch
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:
bodjie.homestead.com/
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:what
can we do???
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:We
tried to warn you via email and a message in the message center.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:matt,
can i get that tool?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:should
we redo the site? completely remove the blog section? blog link?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:On
the bright side, once you fix the hacked stuff you should be able
to get back into Google soon.
- from JD to All Participants:I
thought this stuff wasnt allowed in chatd stuff you should be
able to get back into Google soon.
- rom Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
you'll want to restore to a backup of the site if you have one.
Your webhost may be able to help.
- from JD to All Participants:everyone
and their is going to be crying why their site isn't showing up
in G
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:Webado here - I made it :)
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:learningguitarnow.comll
Participants:
- from Evan to All Participants:Welcome
webado
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Once
you get the site fixed, see http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/09/quick-security-checklist-for-webmasters.html
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:If
we completely remove the blog affiliation right now, will that
help?
- from John Honeck to All Participants:hi
Webado
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:for
some more tips to protect your site, e.g. patching your blog.
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:hello
people
- from Rahul Doshi to All Attendees:hello matts.. please check
my site : www.indiagiftsjunction.com and ur comments would be
great appreciated... :)
- from Manish to All Participants:Matt
I have removed all the external links or nofollowed them but still
I am not getting my PR back ... can u plsssssss help newindiamodels.com
, ktpl.com , kidiezone.com
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:That
would help, but I wouldn't remove your entire blog just to get
rid of the hacked stuff. Just take a little time and work with
a computer-savvy person to remove the hacked content.
- from Manish to All Participants:i
hv sent reconsideration reqsts around 3 times
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
I think we might also be working on a post about "Hey, your
site got hacked. Now what?"ust take a little time and work
with a computer-savvy person to remove the hacked content.
- rom Manish to All Participants:i
hv sent reconsideration reqsts around 3 times
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
I think we might also be working on a post about "Hey, your
site got hacked. Now what?"
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:heh,
that'll be a fun post
- from Laurent to All Participants:What
URL are you talking about in the conference ?
- from Laurent to All Participants:the
dog site ?
- from Evan to All Participants:Hi
Manish, please ask questions directed toward panelists in Q &
A
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:In
the meantime for a quick fix to make up, can i remove the link
from laborlawcenter.com work on fixing blog and re-link back after
it's fixed. at least I can get my business up in the meant time.
our business was drastically cut due to the search engine
- from John to All Participants:good
idea about the feed
- from John to All Participants:John
- from Adam Lasnik to All Participants:digitalbase.eu
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:Matt
cutts, you did a post on that, more details at seroundtable.com/archives/016096.html
- from Evan to All Participants:Laurent
- the dog site was bodjie.homestead.com
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:u
guys should put me on ur payroll
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:digitalbase.eu,
cool.l Participants:
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:lol
@barry
- from Brian Ussery to All Participants:work
it Barry : )
- from Manish to All Participants:I
have tried my best to chk and remove any external links leaking
PR on my sites that were facing PR0 penalty but still no PR ww.newindiamodels.com
, w.ktpl.com , .kidiezone.com
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:LOL
@ Barry :)
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
that could work. Normally it doesn't hurt to take the few extra
hours to recover back to a fully clean state though.
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:How
do I inform you once the site is clean for inclusion back on serps?
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:What
happens when someone takes over a domain and ip address that has
a history of bad neighborhood links and may be penalized by Google?
- from John Jones to All Participants:Barry
aren't you already on someone elses payrol these days? (kidding)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:it's
googles fault Linda's site was hacked, they did it to spam google,
;-)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:funny
john jones
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Did
I just read something about PageRank leaking? must need more coffee
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Blogs
get hacked all the time... if you'd add a wildcard function to
Webmaster Tools it'd be helpful for allowing us to remove bad
stuff from your index quicker. Bad content doesn't always sit
in a directory. thx.
- from JD to All Participants:this
chat is like a digitalpoint thread
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:no
we are not
- from John Jones to All Participants:I
have a feeling i'll be logging into SE roundtable for the last
time after that comment. You are already looking me up.
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:it's
not ISS
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:what
John?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
I'll keep an eye out for it myself.
- from Ian M to All Participants:Why
oh why do Microsoft not make IIS follow the standards.. sigh
- from Gary Carpenter to All Participants:I
setup a webmaster account an submitted my url. I also setup a
Sitemap.xml file. Google reports that the url is indexed and the
Sitemap file is OK yet when I google search my url the result
is "No Documents Found". What have I done wrong???
- from John Honeck to All Participants:JD,
nice! It's not DP because nobody has asked about the next PR update
yet.
- from JD to All Participants:oh
its coming
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:TimDineen,
I think you can use a wildcard in robots.txt.:
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Did
I just read something about PageRank leaking? must need more coffee
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Blogs
get hacked all the time... if you'd add a wildcard function to
Webmaster Tools it'd be helpful for allowing us to remove bad
stuff from your index quicker. Bad content doesn't always sit
in a directory. thx.
- from JD to All Participants:this
chat is like a digitalpoint thread
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:no
we are not
- from John Jones to All Participants:I
have a feeling i'll be logging into SE roundtable for the last
time after that comment. You are already looking me up.
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:it's
not ISS
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:what
John?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
I'll keep an eye out for it myself.
- from Ian M to All Participants:Why
oh why do Microsoft not make IIS follow the standards.. sigh
- from Gary Carpenter to All Participants:I
setup a webmaster account an submitted my url. I also setup a
Sitemap.xml file. Google reports that the url is indexed and the
Sitemap file is OK yet when I google search my url the result
is "No Documents Found". What have I done wrong???
- from John Honeck to All Participants:JD,
nice! It's not DP because nobody has asked about the next PR update
yet.
- from JD to All Participants:oh
its coming
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:TimDineen,
I think you can use a wildcard in robots.txt.
- from Doug to All Participants:you
can
- from Ian M to All Participants:It
all went quiet...
- from Anderson to All Participants:call
lost
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Because
standards are silly! That'd be silly...
- from Dito to All Participants::(
- from Doug to All Participants:I
lost it too
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:deathly
silence on the line
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:No audio
- from Amy Balliett to All Participants:me
too
- from Gary Campbell to All Participants:m2
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:And
too easy. Yeah, lost the call?
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:well
its gone quiet
- from kasia to All Participants:m2
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:are
we able to listen to a recording of this conference ?
- from Jaan Kanellis to All Participants:i
am lost as well
- from Faris to All Participants:me2
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:gone
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:The
blog link is removed. I will clean up blog and put it back on
after integrity is checked. lesson learned. can y ou see if this
suite's google's needs
- from MattD to All Participants:Our
phone connection dropped, we'll be right back on
- from Jeremy Rivera to All Participants:it's
quiet....tooo Quiet...
- from John Honeck to All Participants:And
then it went silent...
- from Ian M to All Participants:Matt
Cutts trip over the cable? :)
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:We're
getting the audio back.
- from Rey Colon to All Participants:i
do not here anythin
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:oh-oh
- from MattD to All Participants:haha
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:arrrgh
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Thanks
Matt - yes, that's what we ended up doing.
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:Ian-
LOL
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Matt,
jeez. What'd you do!
- from TimDineen to All Participants:took
longer that way I think
- from jtbandes to All Participants:Should
have just used a google talk group chat :)
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:thanks
matt
- from kasia to All Participants:still
cant hear
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:is it too late for me to ask nicely
to get an opinion?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
I'll check it out.
- from Phil Peterman to All Attendees:but heard the deep breathing
for a sec
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:I
think I might have heard a sea lion over there.
- from MattD to All Participants:...and
we're back
- from Kevin Rogers to All Participants:and
its back
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:There
we are!
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:yay!
- from John Jones to All Participants:yay!
- from kasia to All Participants:back!
- \from Dito to All Participants:woohoo
- from Liviu Taloi to All Participants:oookiii
- from Ian M to All Participants:yay
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:back
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:yay
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:anyone
know about bad ip bbuying
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:yay!!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:I
know that you're actively working on fixing the hacked blog, so
I expect that you'll come back quickly.
- from Wysz to All Participants::-)
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:Thank
you so much! You don't
- from Scott to All Participants:testing
- \ from Doug to All Participants:Matt
I got alot of people relying on our site and I have done a full
review to see why the site has a dampening penalty on it
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:How
can i just get the www.laborlawcenter.com on serps w/out the blog
since I removed it. lesson learned no more need to discipline
me. :)
- from Manish to All Participants:any
suggestion for me matt
- from Jacque to All Participants:http://209.85.207.104/search?hl=en&q=link%3A+laborlawcenter.com&btnG=Searc
- from John Honeck to All Participants:The
only prescription is more cowbell
- from Jacque to All Participants:Linda
did you just recently have a link building campaign with an SEO
company?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Cowbell!
- from Scott to All Participants:^we
just had an issue like that
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:Matt
cutts, will there be a transcript of this call posted???h an SEO
company?
- rom Scott to All Participants:^we
just had an issue like that
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:Matt
cutts, will there be a transcript of this call posted???
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Yeah
Aaron!
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:Aaron
Pratt is famous now lol
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Um,
not sure Alan Rothstein. It may be something you have to dial
in to experience. :)
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Go
Aaron!
- rom Linda Farm to All Participants:please
help me i feel like a chicken these days a dead one or a cow with
mad cow disease.
- from dockarl to All Participants:nyone
else lost sound?
- from Doug to All Participants:mine
is back
- from Ian M to All Participants:I
still have sound
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:Nope
- from Phil Peterman to All Attendees:yes doc, but it's back
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:I
am listening :) Just wanted to know for future reference
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:we
have it back now, I think
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
to see if it goes back on serps, should i just keep googling laborlawcenter.com
to see if i was put back on
- rom dockarl to All Participants:hmmm...
bugger... I'm podcasting :)
- from John Honeck to All Participants:dockarl,
we have sound here in this hemisphere
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:Sound's OK, Maile is talking about
Aaron's images
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Yup,
I expect that if you can also get the hacked content removed from
the blog, I can see that and get you back in 1-2 days.
- from MattD to All Participants:If
you've lost sound, you may try logging out and back in (classic
tech support solution). It worked for a few people earlier.
- from Andrea Frehner to All Participants:Dear
John,
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:THANKS!
YOU ARE A LIFE SAVER!
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Did
you wiggle the handle?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:do
you have a date of when you noticed the hacked materials and I
can back up the file from then?
- from Liviu Taloi to All Participants:salut
nelu
- from Andrea Frehner to All Participants:I
can see and hear you, Andrea
- from Doug to All Attendees:how many people hear spent over
1 million to build their site?
- from Andrea Frehner to All Participants:Dear
John, sorry, I can not find you, Andrea
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:Image
enhancement. Are we going to here about this and the pros...
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:We
sent you emails and put a message on 3/27/2008 (yesterday), so
the hack was probably pretty recent.
- from devang to All Participants:Guys
will you providing a overview/slides of this session ?), so the
hack was probably pretty recent.
- rom Gary Campbell to All Participants:Can
we save the Q&A test ?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:I
am trying to get it fixed.
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:thanks
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:is
anyone in here recording audio ?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Is
there any way to access the audio to this call over the PC? Google
Talk...?
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:Use Skype .. dial into the US
toll free number
- from Nelu Lazar to All Participants:yeah,
it would be nice to see this session recorded video/audio
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Right,
thanks. Google competitor, lol.
- from Swaroop to All Attendees::)
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:whatever
works :)
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Oh
Oh she said PR, let the blogging begin!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:For
now I'm just glad that things are mostly working in real-time.
But down the road we could definitely think about how to archive
the audio or more.
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:is
this going to be an on going live chat session, Monthly, Quarterly?
- from Ian M to All Participants:Audio
plus presentation is good
- from JD to All Participants:separate?
- from jimbeetle to All Participants:Is
Maile's image presentation going to be avaiable online?
- from devang to All Participants:@
Matt Cutts - so not for this session?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:for
search engine results if we change from .asp to .php and use 301
redirect, would that affect our serps
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Not
positive, devang. I think worst case people can copy much of the
chat text going on.
- from Ian M to All Participants:ok
- question related to this image session - do Google ever pay
attention to title attribute as well as alt one?
- from Evan to All Participants:Hi
Everyone, for Q&A please put all your questions in one entry
if possible, otherwise they will lose context and be confusing.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
.asp vs. .php doesn't make ny difference to us.
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:sorry my quesiton needed 5 messages
- in case anybody even sees it
- from John Honeck to All Participants:set
up the server to serve PHP on .asp so you don't need to change
the URLs
- from aaron to All Attendees:anyone ever noticed a significant
drop in ranks and have webmaster tools show that nothing is wrong??
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Matt,
but what about .html? We serve our dynamic pages as HTML with
variables.hat nothing is wrong??
- from sawan to All Participants:Hi
Matt, does the long URL matter, for any ecommerce site?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Ian
M, good question. I think it would be fair to use other info on
the page to help improve image search (e.g. text near an image
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:is
anyone in here recording audio ?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Is
there any way to access the audio to this call over the PC? Google
Talk...?
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:Use Skype .. dial into the US
toll free number
- from Nelu Lazar to All Participants:yeah,
it would be nice to see this session recorded video/audio
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Right,
thanks. Google competitor, lol.
- from Swaroop to All Attendees::)
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:whatever
works :)
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Oh
Oh she said PR, let the blogging begin!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:For
now I'm just glad that things are mostly working in real-time.
But down the road we could definitely think about how to archive
the audio or more.
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:is
this going to be an on going live chat session, Monthly, Quarterly?
- from Ian M to All Participants:Audio
plus presentation is good
- from JD to All Participants:separate
- from jimbeetle to All Participants:Is
Maile's image presentation going to be avaiable online?
- from devang to All Participants:@
Matt Cutts - so not for this session?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:for
search engine results if we change from .asp to .php and use 301
redirect, would that affect our serps
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Not
positive, devang. I think worst case people can copy much of the
chat text going on.
- from Ian M to All Participants:ok
- question related to this image session - do Google ever pay
attention to title attribute as well as alt one?
- from Evan to All Participants:Hi
Everyone, for Q&A please put all your questions in one entry
if possible, otherwise they will lose context and be confusing.from
Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
.asp vs. .php doesn't make any difference to us.
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:sorry my quesiton needed 5 messages
- in case anybody even sees it
- from John Honeck to All Participants:set
up the server to serve PHP on .asp so you don't need to change
the URLs
- from aaron to All Attendees:anyone ever noticed a significant
drop in ranks and have webmaster tools show that nothing is wrong??
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Matt,
but what about .html? We serve our dynamic pages as HTML with
variables.
- from sawan to All Participants:Hi
Matt, does the long URL matter, for any ecommerce site?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Ian
M, good question. I think it would be fair to use other info on
the page to help improve image search (e.g. text near an image).
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
if i'm in good ranking, if i changed my current address from .asp
to .php, do i need to inform google somehow to know it's the same
site/content just different .asp or .php?
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Yay
Maile
- from sawan to All Participants:Thanks
Maile, that was quite informative
- from Ian M to All Participants:Specifically
about the title attribute,if that's ok?
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:Thanks Maile
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:gwing.net/remaeus-m4.html
actually hosts dynamic content, dynamically rewritten from a .php
file - is that any different from hosting the .php file directly?
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:That was nice. We r looking for
times where you'd say Google can find context on all the media
available. Universally understood search :)
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Isn't
title what is displayed to the user on:hover?
- from Ian M to All Participants:yes
- from Christi to All Participants:So
should the alt and title mirror each other or be different?
- from Ian M to All Participants:unless
you use ie which does the same for alt (because microsoft ignore
standards..)
- from Brian Ussery to All Participants:Does
Google extract exif from images?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Eric,
for .php if stuff happens on the server side, we only see what
the webserver dishes up. So it's fine to have some PHP executing
but available in an .html file.
- from sawan to All Participants:Hi
Matt, does the long URL matter, for any ecommerce site?y see what
the webserver dishes up. So it's fine to have some PHP executing
but available in an .html file.
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:whatever
works :)
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Oh
Oh she said PR, let the blogging begin!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:For
now I'm just glad that things are mostly working in real-time.
But down the road we could definitely think about how to archive
the audio or more.
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:is
this going to be an on going live chat session, Monthly, Quarterly?
- from Ian M to All Participants:Audio
plus presentation is good
- from JD to All Participants:separate?
- from jimbeetle to All Participants:Is
Maile's image presentation going to be avaiable online?
- from devang to All Participants:@
Matt Cutts - so not for this session?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:for
search engine results if we change from .asp to .php and use 301
redirect, would that affect our serps
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Not
positive, devang. I think worst case people can copy much of the
chat text going on.
- from Ian M to All Participants:ok
- question related to this image session - do Google ever pay
attention to title attribute as well as alt one?
- from Evan to All Participants:Hi
Everyone, for Q&A please put all your questions in one entry
if possible, otherwise they will lose context and be confusing.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
.asp vs. .php doesn't make any difference to us.
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:sorry my quesiton needed 5 messages
- in case anybody even sees it
- from John Honeck to All Participants:set
up the server to serve PHP on .asp so you don't need to change
the URLs
- from aaron to All Attendees:anyone ever noticed a significant
drop in ranks and have webmaster tools show that nothing is wrong??
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Matt,
but what about .html? We serve our dynamic pages as HTML with
variables.
- from sawan to All Participants:Hi
Matt, does the long URL matter, for any ecommerce site?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Ian
M, good question. I think it would be fair to use other info on
the page to help improve image search (e.g. text near an image).
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
if i'm in good ranking, if i changed my current address from .asp
to .php, do i need to inform google somehow to know it's the same
site/content just different .asp or .php?
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Yay
Maile
- from sawan to All Participants:Thanks
Maile, that was quite informative
- from Ian M to All Participants:Specifically
about the title attribute,if that's ok?
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:Thanks Maile
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:gwing.net/remaeus-m4.html
actually hosts dynamic content, dynamically rewritten from a .php
file - is that any different from hosting the .php file directly?
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:That was nice. We r looking for
times where you'd say Google can find context on all the media
available. Universally understood search :)
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Isn't
title what is displayed to the user on:hover?
- from Ian M to All Participants:yes\
- from Christi to All Participants:So
should the alt and title mirror each other or be different?
- from Ian M to All Participants:unless
you use ie which does the same for alt (because microsoft ignore
standards..)
- from Brian Ussery to All Participants:Does
Google extract exif from images?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Eric,
for .php if stuff happens on the server side, we only see what
the webserver dishes up. So it's fine to have fome PHP executing
but available in an .html file.
- from sawan to All Participants:Hi
Matt, does the long URL matter, for any ecommerce site?
- from John Jones to All Participants:Thank
you.
- from sawan to All Participants:Matt,
are you saying having .html file as output is much better than
having .php?prod=asaa right?
- from John Honeck to All Participants:sitemaps
documentation states not to include images
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Okay,
thanks Matt - will my page be treated differently for having a
different extension? Or is an URL simply an URL, for example,
if it were entirely without an extension?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Brian,
I'm not sure, personally. I could imagine that any stuff embedded
in an image file might be used, though.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:sawan,
there's two issues here. Extension (.php, .asp, .html) doesn't
matter to us.
- from Ian M to All Participants:I
really don't see why Google bother with the opt-in for the image
game
- from John Jones to All Participants:Thanks
for the direct address on that question guys. for the image game
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:I
kinda see mirroring title and alt as keyword stuffing, personally.
- from sawan to All Participants:Ok,
then does the trailing paramters behind the .php matter....something
like proddetail.php?prod=product_name same as product_name.htm
?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:But
if you can steer away from tons of url parameters, that helps.
- from richard to All Participants:do
subdomains present a potential hotlinking issue?rs, that helps.
- from Terence to All Participants:Is
it possible to copy/paste or export everything in the Q&A
box?
- from Ian M to All Participants:re-geolocation,
I hope that will be covered properly
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:sawan,
I think a shorter URL is better in almost any case, the higher
the ratio of your keywords in the URL, the better
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:2 Matt's :)
- from Ian M to All Participants:Simple
"use x, we don't look at y" is all that iswanted
- from sawan to All Participants:Thanks
Matt
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:/page.php?page=keyword
is less preferrable to /keyword.html or just /keyword
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:/keyword
is likely the bottom-line best URL structure you could use.
- from sawan to All Participants:Eric
and I are on same page
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Eric,
we don't have an explicit "how short is your url" signal,
but clear categories often work better than tons of parameters.
And they can be more memorable as well.
- from sawan to All Participants:i
think /keyword.html is much better
- from Brian Ussery to All Participants:Thanks
Matt
- from Jon to All Participants:Matt
Cutts YOU ROCK
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:Hi
Matt! - To summarize, I officially took that blog link off of
my main www.laborlawcenter.com website and now I am currently
having our database cleaned up to remove those spam from the Blog
and then I will put it back on. Is this sufficient clean up work?
Our company is in dire need of getting the serps listings back
and so I want to know if this is the most efficient and quickest
way to do so.
- from Manish to All Participants:Is
it true that the .com domains are ranked highr in SERPs than say
.in domains ?
- from John Jones to All Participants:haha!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Yup,
I'm on the same page with sawan/Eric. Easy to remember urls are
better for users as well.
- from John to All Participants:I've
been recording from the last 15 minutes
- from Brian Rutledge-GetPageOne.com to
All Participants:I can't imagine no one here is
geeky enough to have recorded it :)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:i
dont think im blogging thisrticipants:
- from Caleb Queern to All Participants:lol
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Linda,
that should get you in good shape quite soon with Google.
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:Hey!
I am recording it in entiretyants:
- from Ian M to All Participants:Maybe
we should put it out as a torrent afterwards
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:not
a geek, i dont think
- from sawan to All Participants:Thanks
Matt, direct information is always helpful... than working in
Dark
- from sawan to All Participants:Thanks
Matt, direct information is always helpful... than working in
Dark
- from John to All Participants:That
would be me. I'm an audio engineer
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:email
it to me schoolgalore
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:yay!
we love you, schoolsgalore
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Always
focus on the user, that is after all your end result
- from Ian M to All Participants:I
cut off the boring start stuff
- from Brian Rutledge-GetPageOne.com to
All Participants:I've been trying to blog it live
as we go, as much as I can keep up, anyway.
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:gimme
emails
- from sawan to All Participants:I
think the idea of direct chat with Google R*O*C*K*S
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:barry
@ rustybrick dot com Participants:
- from Laurent to All Participants:Why
are nofollow links showing in Webmaster Central ?
- from Jesse Craword to All Participants:jesse
@ ce-int.net would appreciate it.\
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:barry
will you repost it on SER?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:This
has been fun. :)
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Because
a nofollow link is stil a link!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:of
coursefrom Rhea DrysdalePC
- from jimbeetle to All Participants:Thanks
SchoolsGalore and thanks Barry
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:Yeah
:)
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:glad
someone is saying about people posting urls in the forum lol
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:definitely
been really fun
- from sawan to All Participants:It
sure is Linda Farm
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:i
don't think this should be beta but permanent
- from Doug to All Attendees:I am gonna post to the forum
- from Laurent to All Participants:I
thought that GG did not follow nofollow
- from Laurent to All Participants:therefore
not index
- from John Honeck to All Participants:17?
try 1700
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Laurent,
the idea of links in the webmaster console is to show practically
all of the links that we know of. That's why we even show nofollow
links.
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Google
does follow "nofollow" links, but it (should) treats
them differently than normal links.
- from Laurent to All Participants:Ok
I get it
- from aaron to All Participants:Why
show the NOFOLLOW links?
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:so
does serps like content that is informative or content that has
alot of relevant keywords?
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:matt,
can those links be labeled in GWC?
- \ from Laurent to All Participants:What
kind of popularity do you give to no
- followfrom Laurent to All Participants:?
- from Rabin to All Participants:looks
like i missed it
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:I
will try to get it to all of ya who give email. Do my best.\
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Laurent,
we don't follow nofollow links, but we do include nofollow links
in the webmaster console just to give webmasters a full picture
of all the stuff that's linking to them.
- from Brian Rutledge-GetPageOne.com to
All Participants:@ Schools, not judging, I am
a geek :) Are you going to post it?
- from Rabin to All Participants:is
there any transcript that i can have or something!
post it?
- rom Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:seriously,
his is a great initiative from google webmaster team, keep up
the good work !
- from Caleb Queern to All Participants:I
second that!
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:Matt,
what can be done to prevent spammy images?
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:i'd
like to see the nofollows labeled as such in GWC
- from Ian M to All Participants:ditto
- from Tim Taylor to All Participants:yah
mon
- from Aaron Chronister to All
Participants:rhea, me too.
- from John to All Participants:Yeah
great information here
- from Ian M to All Participants:(on
both things)
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:good
point rhea
- from aaron to All Participants:yeah...label
the NOFOLLOW links as something else!
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:guarav,
do you mean on your own site?
- from John Jones to All Participants:Who
was the image presentation speaker of this call?
- from Manish to All Participants:Is
there anyway or tool that we can use to see which pages on our
website are leaking PR
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Rhea,
I'll pass that on but I'm not sure whether we can offer that.
- from Aaron Chronister to All
Participants:i'd also like to go back in time
and un-buy some links.... :)
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:I
want to, just need to figure out how. I am not a webmaster, i
am a writer... but I will try to figure out how after this is
over, OK?
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:yes
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:understood,
but worth considering :_)
- from Tim Taylor to All Participants:Maile
Ohye gave the presentation.
- from Laurent to All Participants:Thanks
MC
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:thnx
guys
- from jtbandes to All Participants:Should
we put it up as a torrent?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:What
can be done about "devaluation" link campaigns against
competitor's sites, where thousands of links are provided
- from bad neighborhoods to specific pages? This has been proven
to lower competitors' rankings...
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Excellent
that Google is doing this chat. The Q/A was extremely helpful
too.
- from Ian M to All Participants:Matt
Cutts - on geolocation,can you just quickly tell us what tags
to use?
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:do
you have the entire conference ?
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:as
audio
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Thanks
to all of you! Please do it regularly?
- from SchoolsGalore to All Participants:so
far
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:John,
that was Maile Ohye.
- from Ian M to All Participants:and
what not to usearticipants:
- rom Jeganathan to All Participants:Matt,
Is there a way we can submit bulk of urls to remove from google
index in a single shot? we have hundreads of urls and submitting
them individually is a pain.
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:yup
would love to do this again, great idea adam!
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:It
would be awesome to have a regular Google Help Group chat. Very
useful :)
- from Mark Kaufman to All Participants:Thanks
all!
- from Phil Peterman to All Attendees:anyone have a trick to
save the q&a text, doesn't seem amenable to select all/copy/pasteshot?
we have hundreads of urls and submitting them individually is
a pain.
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:hey Matt Cutts.. One Q.. its unanswered
in the Q&A - Can you tell us about the pro's & con's in
terms of SEO if we use the shortened URL's using TinyUrl or some
other similar service
- from John Jones to All Participants:Please
send participants a survey to suggest how to make this better
for next time and the time after that.
- from Laurent to All Participants:Now
about users. I think GG gives users a give note. For instance,
if the user puts a site in bookmarks or clic an URL on a page.
Am I wrong ?ng TinyUrl or some other similar service
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Can
you make the QA copy-able?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:With
javascript/AJAX/other stuff; always test with Javascript disabled!
Also, view source - if it isn't in the source, even Googlebot
can't see it. ;]
- from John Jones to All Participants:Phill
... File >> Save
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Eric,
we work very hard to prevent people from causing harm like that.!
Also, view source - if it isn't in the source, even Googlebot
can't see it. ;]
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:John,
that was Maile Ohye.
- from Ian M to All Participants:and
what not to use
- from Jeganathan to All Participants:Matt,
Is there a way we can submit bulk of urls to remove from google
index in a single shot? we have hundreads of urls and submitting
them individually is a pain.
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:yup
would love to do this again, great idea adam!
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:It
would be awesome to have a regular Google Help Group chat. Very
useful :)
- from Mark Kaufman to All Participants:Thanks
all!
- from Phil Peterman to All Attendees:anyone have a trick to
save the q&a text, doesn't seem amenable to select all/copy/pastefrom
Swaroop to All Attendees:hey Matt Cutts.. One Q.. its unanswered
in the Q&A - Can you tell us about the pro's & con's in
terms of SEO if we use the shortened URL's using TinyUrl or some
other similar service
- from John Jones to All Participants:Please
send participants a survey to suggest how to make this better
for next time and the time after that.
- from Laurent to All Participants:Now
about users. I think GG gives users a give note. For instance,
if the user puts a site in bookmarks or clic an URL on a page.
Am I wrong ?from TimDineen to All
Participants:Can you make
- the QA copy-able?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:With
javascript/AJAX/other stuff; always test with Javascript disabled!
Also, view source - if it isn't in the source, even Googlebot
can't see it. ;]
- from John Jones to All Participants:Phill
... File >> Save
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Eric,
we work very hard to prevent people from causing harm like that.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:John
Jones, were u joking earlier?
- from Manish to All Participants:Is
there anyway or tool that we can use to see which pages on our
website are leaking PR
- from John Jones to All Participants:Barry
absolutely man. I'll hit you up later via e-mail and explain my
botched joke. Sorry boss.
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Ian
M, look at ccTLD, IP address, and then use the geolocation feature
of the webmaster console.
- from Phil Peterman to All Attendees:John Thanks so much
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:Matt,
i have created new blog in blogger that is related to mobile,
it has been banned by blogger! what can be the reason behind it?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:k,
hard to see jokes here
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Manish,
I agree - a Flash representation of our domains would be very
nice, showing link flow and strength!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:great
job guys!from Swaroop to All Attendees:Loved it !. Bravo !
- from Laurent to All Participants:Merci
all
- from webado - Christina to All
Participants:thanks everybody :):
- from Gary Campbell to All Participants:My
suggestion to Webmaster tools - detail exact issues when penalized
or non compliance - would help millinos of people and reduce requests
on your side as well
- from sawan to All Participants:Adam,
you have been good host
- from John to All Participants:It's
been cool!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:JohnMu
should build an App to do this
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:thanks!
- from Ian M to All Participants:something
that works on all search engines?
- from Felipe Miyata to All Participants:Thank
You !!!
- from Gijs Nelissen to All Participants:webex
should be recording this conferenceno ?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Jeganathan,
if you can come up with a good pattern (subdirectory, subdomain,
or wildcards) you can use our url removal tool.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:no
browser hijack!
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:be
class if this was a regular event
- from Mark to All Participants:Thanks
guys!
- from DaveN to All Attendees:Good Job guys
- from sawan to All Participants:We
are happy for GOOGLE to come close webmasters
- from Doug to All Attendees:this was good
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:Matt,
if you can please take a look at my site in about an hour,everything
will be fixed.
- from Linda Farm to All Participants:THANKS
MATT YOU'RE A LIFE SAVER
- from Tim Taylor to All Participants:ty
guys. I can't wait to see this posted on Youtube with a mashup
of Yakkety Sax behind it.
- from Ian M to All Participants:Matt
- a quick question here would be is this valid or not? <meta
name=language>
- from John Honeck to All Participants:Thanks
all involved
- from Ian M to All Participants:see
the question in the google groups thread
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Yeah,
everyone give a round of applause to the Google team! Please!
*claps*
- from Marjory Meechan to All Participants:Thanks
so much guys. It was great!!
- from sawan to All Participants:You
could be get more than 2 million Adam
- from Alan Rothstein to All Participants:Thanks,
helped tons!
- from Tim Taylor to All Participants:*clapping*
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:woot!
- from Doug to All Attendees:Matt i posted to the google.group,
i need a life saver
- from Brian Rutledge-GetPageOne.com to
All Participants:@ Schools, We'll host it if you
like.
- from Brian Harnish to All Participants:*applause*
- from Laurent to All Participants:When
is the next conference ?
- from Manish to All Participants:thanks
for the great discussion ... hope next time its with Matt Cutts
.... One to One :-)
- from Ian M to All Participants:tomorrow
- from dockarl to All Participants:Props
to all the Googlers - this was excellent :D
- from Manish to All Participants:he
seems to be fav ofall\
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:video Labeller :)
- from Rabin to All Participants:can
we embed videos from youtube to optimize our own site?
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Video
and Image search needs content recognition, not just written text
recognition. :/
- from Doug to All Attendees:this is good for me i got over 40000
images on my site
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:manish
all of 'em have good insight, matt's just pushier ;)
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:guys,
please send me any audio or text u have for this, ill make sure
to post it aroundfrom Jeganathan to
All Participants:Thanks Matt! Is the removal tool
in GWT accepts wilcards?
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Gary,
we keep trying to provide more and more information in the webmaster
console. We've gradually been increasing the number of people
who get info about issues. Linda in the chat had a message waiting
for her, for example, so she didn't need to catch me about this
issue. :)
- from DaveN to All Attendees:http://www.google.com/search?q=video&hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&hs=1Kx&start=10&sa=N
- from DaveN to All Attendees:forbes
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:When
is Google Video going to turn into a Video Search Engine?!?!?!
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:http://www.google.com/search?q=iphone%20popcorn
Search Engine?!?!?!
- from Jonatas Leonel to All Participants:What
is better to use and wich one have more power on google: the robots.txt
or the meta tag robots?
- from Jim McNelis to All Participants:you
can add video to your google maps listing
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:Matt,
still paid links carry the same importance for google rank as
it was having before the last PR update
- from aaron to All Attendees:Anyone have any tips on how can
evaluate my links?
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:shameless
plug barry ha
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Ian,
I don't think we use meta tags for language right now.
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:lol
- from Ian M to All Participants:any
meta tags? or http headers?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:im
link dropping like mad, webex link spamnguage right now.
- from Ian M to All Participants:we
keep having pages with french words appearing as french language
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:at
least it isn't ascii art drops
- from Rabin to All Participants:i
am wondering if we embed the video from youtube in my site, is
there anyway, that i can have my site optimized!
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:jim...
address, google local business center listing, etc
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:90%
of a link's value is because of the content on the linking page,
and the value of the page - which, in results, will flow more
organic visitors, which is why links are valuable.
- from DaveN to All Attendees:so asking people to remove the
nofollow is fine if no money passes
- from Swaroop to All Attendees:@JonathanSimon ! - I just guessed
... you'd have one :
- from Ian M to All Participants:all
support nofollow - ask took a bit longer to implement but also
do
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:thanks
Eric
- from Jim McNelis to All Participants:Rhea,
I mean beyond that
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Cut
the linkjuice, cut the value of a link, and you're making the
wrong issue out of the real problem
- from MattD to All Participants:Her
is the link to the feedback thread: http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-chit-chat/browse_thread/thread/1542e1682e7a1a4e/996878822f95bb96
- from Rabin to All Participants:some
bloggers, i am not going to name, they are just bashing this nofollow,
so i am kind of confused
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Rhea,
true dat. :) I'm holding back to let Adam tackle the subdomains
vs. subdirectories question. :)
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:The
real solution would be to improve content detection, and put less
value on the links that don't match the page's (and target pages)
"keyword set"
- from Doug to All Attendees:I like both subdomains and subdirectories
- from Doug to All Attendees:really have no preferences:
- from chris to All Attendees:the question was, what happens if
someone WON'T remove the links after you have contacted him
- from Brian Rutledge-GetPageOne.com to
All Participants:Why do subdomains work so well
for Apartments.com then, they just have landing pages and they
rank like mad
- from DaveN to All Attendees:hmmm type in google
..
- from DaveN to All Attendees:wouldn't sitelinks help
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:Matt,
whatz the future of social bookmarking sites in google web search?
- from TimDineen to All Participants:Speaking
of subdomains -- the problem is that I agree subdomains are same
as directories.. but we see other sites spamming the heck out
of Google with useless subdoms all the time. It causes some to
want to move in that direction.
- from Rabin to All Participants:i
am wondering how search within search feature google recently
deployed is going to affect the subdomain conundrum!
- from Jim McNelis to All Participants:why
do digg articles rank so well since it just links to the original
article
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:eh,
but good sites like national geographic are built on subdomains,
too.
- from Eric Martindale to All Participants:Digg
articles rank because of their link structure, particularly internally
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Jeganathan,
I know that wildcards are supported in robots.txt. Not positive
about the url removal tool though. It does support directories
though.
- from chris to All Attendees:so the NY Times content is less
valuable b/c they sell the feed of their articles. that makes
no sense
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:it
does make sense
- from aaron to All Attendees:can we talk about links???
- from DaveN to All Attendees:so NO rss
- from Laurent to All Participants:Why
proxies appear in SERPS with copies of pages ?sell the feed of
their articles. that makes no sense
- from Doug to All Attendees:syndicating content should be done
on a case by case basis
- from Matt Cutts to All Participants:Jonatas
Leonel, the robots.txt is very powerful because you can block
vast swaths of urls. The meta tag is helpful though because it's
so granular.
- from Darren Wyles to All Participants:if
you search for something and the first 200, results are for the
same article from 200 different sites?
- from Barry Schwartz to All Participants:i
thought it was 42%
- from Rhea DrysdalePC to All Participants:and
now google offers a robots.txt generator... yay
- from gaurav doshi to All Participants:Rhea,
where can i find that generator?
|