Google Jaggers aftermath
There are still a lot of questions to be sure, but there are some good beginnings of answers as well. Since this update was rolled out over months and in three distinct phases, it has been much more difficult to determine what factors have been given more or less weight.
What are some theories? Here are some of the top ones and, this is not a full list; there are most likely numerous other factors that affect Google rankings after Jagger that no one has recognized at all yet. Read the following.
Factors That Could Possibly HELP More in Jagger’s Aftermath
Aged Domains – Sites with domains that are older rank better now – the older the domain, the better its rankings with all other things being equal.
Very Relevant Links – Inbound links and outbound links relevancy is more important after Jagger. This means that if you point to related sites or you get links from other sites that are related to your website, you may rank better after Jagger with all other things being equal.
Links From Trusted Sites Help – Trust Rank is more important than ever after Jagger. Trust Rank is a concept that says if you get a link pointing to your site that is highly trusted by Google then you will rank better with all other things being equal.
Variety of Links – Links from .edu and .org websites are good for increasing your rankings and are more important than ever.
Aged Links – The older the link that points to your site, the more weight it’s given now.
Embedded Links – Links that are embedded in sentences and paragraphs instead of stand-alone links are weighted more heavily now.
Article Links – Articles are what directories had been a year or two ago for link building. Links from the author by-line or within the article that point back to your site will positively affect your rankings.
Fresh & Unique Content – Now, more than ever, regularly updated and added ordinal content will help your rankings.
High Traffic & Stickiness – User popularity statistics now, or will soon, affect rankings. In other words, user actions on your website, like how long they stay (stickiness), how many pages they visit, and even how many people visit your site in a given period, can all affect how Google ranks your site.
Factors That Could Possibly Not Help Anymore, or May Even HURT More In Jagger’s Aftermath
Duplicate Content – Any kind of duplicate content can hurt your rankings. Some say this only refers to other sites having the same content as you while others say even duplicate content within your own site can be bad. I find the latter hard to believe since all sites have repeating slogans, phrases, checkout instructions, or any number of other duplicate sentences within the same site.
Hidden Text – Hidden text within your html, in div tags, CSS, or comments, can negatively affect your rankings.
Decreased Rate of Link Building – The speed and volume of inbound link creation to your site from other websites, if changed, can negatively affect your rankings more so now.
Linking to Bad Neighborhoods – Reciprocal link trades hurt your rankings when you link to sites that are considered ‘bad neighborhoods’ by Google, such as link farms or sites that are banned by Google.
Link Schemes – Participating in link schemes such as Co-ops or Link Vault can hurt your ranking more than help them.
A clean, simple, fast-loading site with natural links pointing to it from a variety of other related websites, some .org’s and .edu’s, others from trusted authority sites, and many from small related websites, that adds fresh and unique content daily, will rank well in Google over time and won’t be affected by any update, including Jagger.
No comments yet.
Leave a comment
Search
Blogroll
Categories
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2025
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2020
- January 2017
- May 2016
- December 2015
- July 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005




